Literature DB >> 3996784

Some comparisons between auditory brain stem response thresholds, latencies, and the pure-tone audiogram.

M P Gorga, D W Worthington, J K Reiland, K A Beauchaine, D E Goldgar.   

Abstract

Aspects of auditory brain stem responses (ABR) and pure-tone behavioral audiograms were compared in patients with cochlear hearing loss. Click-evoked ABR thresholds appeared to be related most closely to the audiometric thresholds at 2000 and 4000 Hz, with relatively poor agreement at either 1000 or 8000 Hz. These results were related to the amplitude spectrum of the eliciting stimulus. The slope of the wave V latency-intensity function appeared to be related to the configuration of the hearing loss. Patients with high-frequency sensorineural losses had steeper slopes than normal subjects, whereas patients with flat sensorineural losses had shallower slopes. These results were related to the principle that response latency is determined by the cochlear region that predominates the ABR for different stimulus intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3996784     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198503000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  25 in total

1.  The relationship of audibility and the development of canonical babbling in young children with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Sandie M Bass-Ringdahl
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-05-10

2.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Tiffany A Johnson; Jan R Kaminski; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Temporary hearing loss influences post-stimulus time histogram and single neuron action potential estimates from human compound action potentials.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The audiologic assessment of the young pediatric patient: the clinic.

Authors:  D L Sabo
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1999-06

Review 6.  Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences.

Authors:  Gary Rance
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 7.  [Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve function during cerebello-pontine angle surgery].

Authors:  S Rampp; T Rahne; S K Plontke; C Strauss; J Prell
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Mutations in the Wolfram syndrome type 1 gene (WFS1) define a clinical entity of dominant low-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Marci M Lesperance; James W Hall; Theresa B San Agustin; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-04

10.  Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex inhibition of human cochlear nerve responses.

Authors:  J T Lichtenhan; U S Wilson; K E Hancock; J J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.