Literature DB >> 3990326

Update on infections involving permanent pacemakers. Characterization and management.

A B Lewis, D L Hayes, D R Holmes, R E Vlietstra, J R Pluth, M J Osborn.   

Abstract

From January, 1974, to December, 1983, 75 patients with infections related to permanent pacemakers were successfully treated. Demographic characterization, mode of presentation, types of infecting organisms, potential predisposing factors, significance of a retained infected pacemaker lead, and various medical and surgical treatment methods were analyzed. Likely infecting organisms depended on the mode of presentation and the time of the infection. Dermatologic diseases accounted for a significant number of secondary infections. Removal of the entire infected pacing system was required for eradication of infection in 74 of 75 patients. In 31 patients, the infected system was removed at the same time that the new system was implanted. In 26 patients, a two-stage procedure was used that included a period of temporary pacing between explantation of the old system and implantation of the new. No difference in complications or incidence of reinfection was found between these two groups. Infections occurring within 2 weeks after operation accounted for 15% of the cases. In these patients, Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism. In patients with later infections, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3990326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Pacemaker lead infection: echocardiographic features, management, and outcome.

Authors:  F Victor; C De Place; C Camus; H Le Breton; C Leclercq; D Pavin; P Mabo; C Daubert
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Local symptoms at the site of pacemaker implantation indicate latent systemic infection.

Authors:  D Klug; F Wallet; D Lacroix; C Marquié; C Kouakam; S Kacet; R Courcol
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Infection of a pacemaker by Brucella melitensis.

Authors:  A de la Fuente; J R Sanchez; J Uriz; J Reparaz; J L Lopez-Coronado; I Moriones
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1997

5.  Management of infections involving implanted cardiac electrophysiologic devices.

Authors:  Frédéric L Paulin; Lorne J Gula; Raymond Yee; Allan C Skanes; George J Klein; Andrew D Krahn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-09

Review 6.  Endovascular extraction techniques for pacemaker and ICD lead extraction: Part 1.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  Endovascular extraction techniques: Part 2: Complications and indications.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Reflections of six years of lead extraction: influence on indications and technique.

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; B van Gelder
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Pacemaker endocarditis: an important clinical entity.

Authors:  Kalpa De Silva; Amanda Fife; Francis Murgatroyd; Nicholas Gall
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-18

10.  Mechanical, but not infective, pacemaker erosion may be successfully managed by re-implantation of pacemakers.

Authors:  M J Griffith; J P Mounsey; R S Bexton; M P Holden
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.