Literature DB >> 3989905

Clinical pharmacology of apramycin in calves.

G Ziv, A Bor, S Soback, D Elad, J F Nouws.   

Abstract

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of apramycin, a unique aminocyclitol antibiotic, were compared with the MIC of dihydrostreptomycin and neomycin for 323 Salmonella, 178 Escherichia coli and twenty-six Pasteurella multocida isolates recovered from newborn calves. Apramycin exhibited better in vitro anti-bacterial activity than dihydrostreptomycin and neomycin; isolates of Salmonella group B and E. coli resistant to the latter were sensitive to apramycin. The two-compartment open model was appropriate for the analysis of serum apramycin concentrations measured after intravenous (i.v.) administration. The distribution half-life (t 1/2 alpha) of the drug was 28 min, the elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta) was 4.4 h, and the apparent volume of distribution (V1) and the distribution volume at steady state (Vdss) were 0.34 and 0.71 l/kg, respectively. The drug was quickly and completely absorbed after intramuscular (i.m.) injection; peak serum drug concentrations were directly related to the dose administered, they were obtained 1-2 h after treatment and the i.m. t 1/2 beta was 5 h. There was no evidence of drug accumulation in the serum after three daily i.m. injections at 20 mg/kg. More than 95% of the i.v. and i.m. doses were recovered in the urine within 96 h post-treatment but the cumulative percentage of drug recovery in the urine after oral treatment was 11%. The durations of free drug concentrations in the tissues after i.v. and i.m. injection were estimated from the serum drug level data, percent of serum protein binding, Vdss, t 1/2 beta, and the MIC. Computations showed that apramycin should be administered i.m. at 20 mg/kg every 24 h in order to maintain in tissues potentially effective drug concentrations sufficient to inhibit 50% of the Salmonella, E. coli, and P. multocida isolates, and at 12-h intervals to inhibit 90% of the isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3989905     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1985.tb00930.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0140-7783            Impact factor:   1.786


  5 in total

1.  Interspecies differences in the pharmacokinetics of kanamycin and apramycin.

Authors:  L D Lashev; D A Pashov; T N Marinkov
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Evaluation of apramycin against spectinomycin-resistant and -susceptible strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel; Divya Vijayakumar; Gretchen Berg; Anthony D Kang; Kenneth P Smith; James E Kirby
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Evaluation of apramycin activity against methicillin-resistant, methicillin-sensitive, and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates.

Authors:  Katherine A Truelson; Thea Brennan-Krohn; Kenneth P Smith; James E Kirby
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  Characterization and utilization of methyltransferase for apramycin production in Streptoalloteichus tenebrarius.

Authors:  Junyang Sun; Hongjing Gao; Danyang Yan; Yu Liu; Xianpu Ni; Huanzhang Xia
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.258

Review 5.  Antimicrobial use in the treatment of calf diarrhea.

Authors:  Peter D Constable
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.