Literature DB >> 3983979

Social and psychological perspectives on voluntary sterilization: a review.

S G Philliber, W W Philliber.   

Abstract

This paper reviews social science research on the antecedents and consequences of voluntary sterilization. The major conclusions are that socioeconomic status has little impact on the decision to be sterilized and that sterilizations are rare among those without sons and among male non-whites. Significant others are important sources of encouragement and information, and good marital relations increase the likelihood of having the procedure performed. Most acceptors experience no change in sexual activity, quality of marital relationships, or work-related behavior, and few regret their choice. Negative consequences are more likely among those in India, those coerced into having a sterilization, those who did not understand the consequences of the procedure, those with health complications after sterilization, and those couples who have unstable marriages or who disagree about sterilization.

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Africa; Americas; Asia; Behavior; Blacks; Catholicism; Christianity; Communication; Decision Making; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Economic Factors; Ethnic Groups; Europe; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Female Sterilization; Hispanics; India; Influentials; Islam; Knowledge Sources; Latin America; Literature Review; Male Sterilization; Motivation; North America; Northern America; Oceania; Parity; Psychological Factors; Psychosocial Factors; Religion; Sex Behavior; Socioeconomic Factors; Socioeconomic Status; Southern Asia; Sterilization Seekers; Sterilization, Sexual; United States; Vasectomy; Whites

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3983979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Fam Plann        ISSN: 0039-3665


  8 in total

1.  Changing Educational Differentials in Female Sterilization.

Authors:  Sarah R Hayford; Alexandra Kissling; Karen Benjamin Guzzo
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2020-05-28

2.  Racial differences in vasectomy utilization in the United States: data from the national survey of family growth.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Jillian T Henderson; John K Amory; James F Smith; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Low rates of vasectomy among minorities: a result of differential receipt of counseling?

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Charity G Moore; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2009-08-25

4.  The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries.

Authors:  Mieke C W Eeckhaut; Megan M Sweeney
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-21

5.  Does vasectomy explain the difference in tubal sterilization rates between black and white women?

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Eleanor B Schwarz; Matthew F Reeves; James E Bost; Mitchell D Creinin; Said A Ibrahim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Post-vasectomy depression: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Subahani Shaik; Ravi Philip Rajkumar
Journal:  Ment Illn       Date:  2014-09-19

Review 7.  Infertility, impotence, and emasculation--psychosocial contexts for abandoning reproduction.

Authors:  Erik Wibowo; Thomas W Johnson; Richard J Wassersug
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Long-term safety, health and mental status in men with vasectomy.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Li Wu; Xiangbin Kong; Yaoping Chen; Honggang Li; Yiqun Gu; Xuejun Shang; Chengliang Xiong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.