Literature DB >> 3982267

Metabolic and cinematographic analysis of walking and running in men and women.

Y Bhambhani, M Singh.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to compare the total metabolic costs and gait patterns of walking and running at self-selected, comfortable speeds in males and females. Total oxygen consumption was used to determine the metabolic cost, and cinematographic analysis was used to study the gait patterns of walking and running a distance of 1 km in 12 male and 12 female subjects. No significant sex difference was observed for the speed, vertical lift per stride, and total vertical lift per km of distance walked. Females ran at a significantly slower speed than males (P less than .01), but no significant sex difference was observed for the vertical lift per stride or total vertical lift per km of distance run. In both sexes, the gross and net energy costs of running were significantly greater (P less than .001) than those of walking when values were expressed as kcal . kg-1 . km-1 or cal . kg-1 . stride-1. No significant sex difference was observed in the gross or net metabolic cost of walking, whereas during running, the gross and net metabolic costs in kcal . kg-1 . km-1 were significantly higher (P less than .05) in females than in males. It was hypothesized that this sex difference was due to the cumulative effect of several factors which were biomechanical and metabolic in nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3982267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  10 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting the energy cost of level running at submaximal speed.

Authors:  Jean-René Lacour; Muriel Bourdin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Variability of cardio-respiratory, electromyographic, and perceived exertion responses at the walk-run transition in a sample of young men controlled for anthropometric and fitness characteristics.

Authors:  Walace D Monteiro; Paulo T V Farinatti; Carlos G de Oliveira; Claudio Gil S Araújo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Understanding sex differences in the cost of terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  John J Lees; Robert L Nudds; Lars P Folkow; Karl-Arne Stokkan; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The effects of changing exercise levels on weight and age-related weight gain.

Authors:  P T Williams; P D Wood
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.095

Review 5.  Biomechanics and running economy.

Authors:  T Anderson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Influence of training, sex, age and body mass on the energy cost of running.

Authors:  M Bourdin; J Pastene; M Germain; J R Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

7.  Superior Intrinsic Mitochondrial Respiration in Women Than in Men.

Authors:  Daniele A Cardinale; Filip J Larsen; Tomas A Schiffer; David Morales-Alamo; Björn Ekblom; Jose A L Calbet; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Robert Boushel
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Terrestrial locomotion energy costs vary considerably between species: no evidence that this is explained by rate of leg force production or ecology.

Authors:  Lewis G Halsey; Craig R White
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparison and predicted equation of energy expenditure during walking or running among Caucasians, African Americans and Asians.

Authors:  Xi Jin; Teresa Carithers; Mark Loftin
Journal:  Sports Med Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-06

10.  Sex differences in gait utilization and energy metabolism during terrestrial locomotion in two varieties of chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) selected for different body size.

Authors:  Kayleigh A Rose; Robert L Nudds; Patrick J Butler; Jonathan R Codd
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.422

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.