Literature DB >> 21085983

Variability of cardio-respiratory, electromyographic, and perceived exertion responses at the walk-run transition in a sample of young men controlled for anthropometric and fitness characteristics.

Walace D Monteiro1, Paulo T V Farinatti, Carlos G de Oliveira, Claudio Gil S Araújo.   

Abstract

The cardio-respiratory (heart rate, HR; oxygen uptake, VO(2;) expired carbon dioxide, VCO(2); ventilation, VE), electromyographic (EMG; medial gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis, rectus femoralis, and anterior tibialis), and perceived exertion (PE) responses during a protocol for the determination of the walk-run transition speed (WRTS) were investigated. From an initial sample of 453 volunteers, 12 subjects matched for age, anthropometric characteristics [height, weight, lower limb length (LLL)], cardio-respiratory fitness (peak oxygen consumption, VO(2peak); ventilatory threshold, VT; maximal HR), and habitual physical activity levels were selected (age = 18.6 ± 0.5 years; height = 174.5 ± 1.4 cm; weight = 66.4 ± 1.1 kg; LLL = 83.3 ± 1.2 cm, VO(2peak) = 52.2 ± 2.2 ml kg(-1) min(-1); VT = 39.8 ± 2.6 ml kg(-1) min(-1)). The highly reproducible WRTS determination protocol (ICC = 0.92; p < 0.0001) consisted in 2-min warm-up at 5.5 km h(-1) followed by increments of 0.1 km h(-1) every 15 s. Between-subjects variability of the measured variables during 24 walking and 12 running velocities (from 80 to 120% of WRTS) was compared to WRTS variation. The coefficient of variation for WRTS was 7.8%, which was within the range of variability for age, anthropometric variables, VO(2peak), and maximal HR (from 5 to 12%). Cardio-respiratory responses at WRTS had a greater variation (VO(2) about 50%; VE/VCO(2) about 35%; VE/VO(2) about 45%; HR about 30%). The highest variation was found for PE (from 70 to 90%) whereas EMG variables showed the lowest variation (from 25 to 30%). Linear regression between EMG series and VO(2) data showed that VO(2) reflected the increase in muscle activity only before the WRTS. These results support the hypothesis that the walk-run transition phenomenon is determined by mechanical variables such as limb length and its relationship to biomechanical model rather than by metabolic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21085983     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1720-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  34 in total

1.  The effects of frequency of encouragement on performance during maximal exercise testing.

Authors:  Joseph L Andreacci; Linda M LeMura; Steven L Cohen; Ethan A Urbansky; Sara A Chelland; Serge P Von Duvillard
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  Energy cost of running.

Authors:  R MARGARIA; P CERRETELLI; P AGHEMO; G SASSI
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1963-03       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Muscle mechanical work and elastic energy utilization during walking and running near the preferred gait transition speed.

Authors:  Kotaro Sasaki; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Effects of changing protocol, grade, and direction on the preferred gait transition speed during human locomotion.

Authors:  Alan Hreljac; Rodney Imamura; Rafael F Escamilla; W Brent Edwards
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The relationship between gait transition speed and the aerobic thresholds for walking and running.

Authors:  D Sentija; G Markovic
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.118

6.  Determinants of the gait transition speed during human locomotion: kinematic factors.

Authors:  A Hreljac
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion.

Authors:  A Hreljac
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Errors in predicting functional capacity from a treadmill exercise stress test.

Authors:  K E Ragg; T P Murray; L M Karbonit; D A Jump
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Optimizing the exercise protocol for cardiopulmonary assessment.

Authors:  M J Buchfuhrer; J E Hansen; T E Robinson; D Y Sue; K Wasserman; B J Whipp
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1983-11

10.  Metabolic and cinematographic analysis of walking and running in men and women.

Authors:  Y Bhambhani; M Singh
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  5 in total

1.  Inter-stride variability triggers gait transitions in mammals and birds.

Authors:  Michael C Granatosky; Caleb M Bryce; Jandy Hanna; Aidan Fitzsimons; Myra F Laird; Kelsey Stilson; Christine E Wall; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Signaling prodromes of sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Ivana Vranic
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.363

3.  Relationship between perceived exertion and blood lactate concentrations during incremental running test in young females.

Authors:  Daijiro Abe; Takayoshi Yoshida; Hatsumi Ueoka; Koji Sugiyama; Yoshiyuki Fukuoka
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-01-22

4.  Economical Speed and Energetically Optimal Transition Speed Evaluated by Gross and Net Oxygen Cost of Transport at Different Gradients.

Authors:  Daijiro Abe; Yoshiyuki Fukuoka; Masahiro Horiuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fast men slow more than fast women in a 10 kilometer road race.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Vittorio Addona; Rickey E Carter; Michael J Joyner; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.