Literature DB >> 3978537

A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

N D Goldstuck, M L Matthews.   

Abstract

The expected, immediate, and three-minute pain response following IUCD insertion was evaluated in 84 nulliparous women undergoing a first IUCD insertion. Expected pain was significantly higher than immediate pain and both were significantly higher than three-minute pain. Immediate pain following IUCD insertion was positively related to expected pain but the relationship was not strong enough to be of clinical value. The pain was significantly related to the degree of cervical resistance and this relationship was made much more obvious by the use of the expected pain parameter which is a valuable additional clinical measurement in pain research. IUCD insertion pain consists of a short cervical (less than 3 minutes) and longer fundal component. Avoiding excessive uterine manipulation during device insertion results in lower immediate and later pain response scores for a given device when comparisons are made with other studies, where standard techniques were used.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Clinical Research; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Diseases; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Insertion; Iud; Pain; Physiology; Research Methodology; Signs And Symptoms; Treatment; Urogenital System; Uterus

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3978537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Reprod Fertil        ISSN: 0725-556X


  6 in total

1.  Anticipated Pain During Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Tegan A Hunter; Sarita Sonalkar; Courtney A Schreiber; Lisa K Perriera; Mary D Sammel; Aletha Y Akers
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 1.814

Review 2.  When can a woman have an intrauterine device inserted? A systematic review.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Crystal P Tyler; Suzanne G Folger; Mary E Gaffield; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 3.  Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review.

Authors:  Kristina Gemzell-Danielsson; Jeffrey T Jensen; Ilza Monteiro; Tina Peers; Maria Rodriguez; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Luis Bahamondes
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Comparison of Intrauterine Device Insertion-Related Pain and Ease of Procedure at Different Times During Menstruation.

Authors:  Meryem Hocaoglu; Taner Gunay; Ergul Demircivi Bor; Ayse Gul Nur; Abdulkadir Turgut; Ates Karateke
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2021-09-30

Review 5.  Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Yanwu Zeng; Rebecca H Allen; Deborah Bartz; Paul A O'Brien; David Hubacher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-29

6.  A comparison of the expected and actual pain experienced by women during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  Nataliya Brima; Hannat Akintomide; Vivian Iguyovwe; Susan Mann
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2015-02-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.