Literature DB >> 22995537

When can a woman have an intrauterine device inserted? A systematic review.

Maura K Whiteman1, Crystal P Tyler, Suzanne G Folger, Mary E Gaffield, Kathryn M Curtis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine device (IUD) insertion during menses may be viewed as preferable by some providers, as it provides reassurance that the woman is not pregnant. However, this practice may result in unnecessary inconvenience and cost to women. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for the effect of inserting IUDs on different days of the menstrual cycle on contraceptive continuation, effectiveness and safety. STUDY
DESIGN: We searched the MEDLINE database for peer-reviewed articles published in any language from database inception through March 2012 concerning the effect of inserting copper IUDs (Cu-IUD) or levonorgestrel-releasing IUDs (LNG-IUDs) on different days of the menstrual cycle on contraceptive continuation, effectiveness, and safety. The quality of each individual piece of evidence was assessed using the United States Preventive Services Task Force grading system.
RESULTS: We identified eight articles that met the criteria for review. Each study examined the Cu-IUD; no studies were identified that examined the LNG-IUD. Overall, these studies suggest that timing of Cu-IUD insertion has little effect on longer term outcomes (rates of continuation, removal, expulsion, or pregnancy) or on shorter term outcomes (pain at insertion, bleeding at insertion, immediate expulsion). Specifically, there was no evidence to suggest that outcomes were better when Cu-IUD insertions were performed during menses. Limitations of the studies include small sample sizes for insertions performed during later days of the menstrual cycle and non-randomized assignment to timing of insertion.
CONCLUSIONS: There is fair evidence (body of evidence grading: II-2, fair) indicating that timing of Cu-IUD insertion has little effect on contraceptive continuation, effectiveness or safety. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22995537      PMCID: PMC4578632          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

1.  Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.

Authors:  R P Harris; M Helfand; S H Woolf; K N Lohr; C D Mulrow; S M Teutsch; D Atkins
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Likelihood of conception with a single act of intercourse: providing benchmark rates for assessment of post-coital contraceptives.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; D B Dunson; C R Weinberg; J Trussell; D D Baird
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Important factors in the use-effectiveness of the copper-T-200 IUD.

Authors:  O Akinla; T Luukkainen; H Timonen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.

Authors:  N D Goldstuck; M L Matthews
Journal:  Clin Reprod Fertil       Date:  1985-03

5.  The timing of the "fertile window" in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study.

Authors:  A J Wilcox; D Dunson; D D Baird
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-18

6.  Pain response following insertion of a Gravigard (Copper-7) intrauterine contraceptive device in nulliparous women.

Authors:  N D Goldstuck
Journal:  Int J Fertil       Date:  1981

7.  Experience with IUCD insertion outside of menses in Kenya.

Authors:  D A Kokonya; S K Sinei; C B Sekadde-Kigondu; C S Morrison; C Kwok; D H Weiner
Journal:  East Afr Med J       Date:  2000-07

8.  Preventing copper intrauterine device removals due to side effects among first-time users: randomized trial to study the effect of prophylactic ibuprofen.

Authors:  David Hubacher; Veronica Reyes; Sonia Lillo; Bosny Pierre-Louis; Ana Zepeda; Pai-Lien Chen; Horacio Croxatto
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Intrauterine device termination rates and the menstrual cycle day of insertion.

Authors:  M K White; H W Ory; J B Rooks; R W Rochat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Timing of the IUD insertion.

Authors:  D A Edelman; J Zipper; M Rivera; M Medel
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  5 in total

1.  In Reply.

Authors:  Sheila K Mody; Lynn L Ngo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The use of long-acting reversible contraceptives in Latin America and the Caribbean: current landscape and recommendations.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Claudio Villarroel; Natalia Frías Guzmán; Silvia Oizerovich; Norma Velázquez-Ramírez; Ilza Monteiro
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2018-01-23

3.  Efficacy and Satisfaction Rate in Postpartum Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Pulwasha M Iftikhar; Nighat Shaheen; Ena Arora
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-13

4.  Comparison of Intrauterine Device Insertion-Related Pain and Ease of Procedure at Different Times During Menstruation.

Authors:  Meryem Hocaoglu; Taner Gunay; Ergul Demircivi Bor; Ayse Gul Nur; Abdulkadir Turgut; Ates Karateke
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2021-09-30

5.  Contraception for Adolescents

Authors:  Nicole Todd; Amanda Black
Journal:  J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.