Literature DB >> 3977492

Persuasive communication and medical technology assessment.

J D Winkler, K N Lohr, R H Brook.   

Abstract

Assessments of medical technologies with respect to their efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness are expected to influence clinical practice, but they are often lost in an avalanche of medical information. We developed a conceptual model that may aid understanding of the potential impact on clinical practice of new medical information in general and assessment information in particular. The model identifies aspects of medical communication that may influence an assessment's subsequent impact, including sources, messages, channels, audiences, and settings. We reviewed the literature on how medical information diffuses to physicians and highlighted those factors likely to heighten physicians' awareness and decisions to incorporate recommended medical advances. We outlined implications for educational interventions and promising research directions.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  18 in total

1.  Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-09

Review 2.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

3.  Translating clinical trials into clinical practice: a survey assessing the potential impact of the Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle Trial.

Authors:  Victor Zak; Daphne T Hsu; Victoria L Pemberton; Jami C Levine; Andrew M Atz; James F Cnota; Chitra Ravishankar; Piers Barker; Linda M Lambert; Brian W McCrindle; Michele A Frommelt; Karen Altmann; Shan Chen; Richard V Williams
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 1.093

4.  Are physicians learning from what they read in journals?

Authors:  P P Morgan
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1985-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Guidelines for dyspepsia management in general practice using focus groups.

Authors:  A P Hungin; G P Rubin; A J Russell; B Convery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice.

Authors:  M Conroy; W Shannon
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Development of guidelines for general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 8.  Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research.

Authors:  Rachel G Tabak; Elaine C Khoong; David A Chambers; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Quality of care of Egyptian asthmatic children: clinicians adherence to asthma guidelines.

Authors:  Ashraf A Salama; Ahmed A Mohammed; El Sayed E El Okda; Rasha M Said
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.638

10.  A multifaceted strategy for implementation of the Ottawa ankle rules in two emergency departments.

Authors:  Taryn Bessen; Robyn Clark; Sepehr Shakib; Geoffrey Hughes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.