Literature DB >> 10139412

Quality improvement by peer review in primary care: a practical guide.

R Grol1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 10139412      PMCID： PMC1055218          DOI： 10.1136/qshc.3.3.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN： 0963-8172


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Implementing clinical practice guidelines: social influence strategies and practitioner behavior change.

Authors:  B S Mittman; X Tonesk; P D Jacobson
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-12

2.  The state of the art versus the state of the science. The diffusion of new medical technologies into practice.

Authors:  A L Greer
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Promoting change in clinical care.

Authors:  B Stocking
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

5.  Educational potential of medical audit: observations from a study of small groups setting standards.

Authors:  J Newton; A Hutchinson; N Steen; I Russell; E Haimes
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-12

Review 6.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

7.  Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section.

Authors:  J Lomas; M Enkin; G M Anderson; W J Hannah; E Vayda; J Singer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Peer review in primary care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care       Date:  1990

Review 9.  Effects of feedback of information on clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Mugford; P Banfield; M O'Hanlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-17

10.  Continuing educational requirements for general practitioners in Grampian.

Authors:  G G Shirriffs
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05
View more
  15 in total

1.  Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers.

Authors:  P van den Hombergh; R Grol; H J van den Hoogen; W J van den Bosch
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-09

2.  Pre-randomization decisions and group stratification in a randomized controlled trial to improve prescribing.

Authors:  Martine E C van Eijk; Arsenio H P Paes; Arijan Porsius; Jerry Avorn; Anthonius de Boer
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-08

3.  Changing the clinical behavior of doctors: a psychological framework.

Authors:  N Robertson; R Baker; H Hearnshaw
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

4.  Development and testing of an assessment instrument for the formative peer review of significant event analyses.

Authors:  J McKay; D J Murphy; P Bowie; M-L Schmuck; M Lough; K W Eva
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-04

5.  Can GPs audit their ability to detect psychological distress? One approach and some unresolved issues.

Authors:  A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Implementation of quality assurance and medical audit: general practitioners' perceived obstacles and requirements.

Authors:  R Grol; M Wensing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Can small group education and peer review improve care for patients with asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Authors:  I J Smeele; R P Grol; C P van Schayck; W J van den Bosch; H J van den Hoogen; J W Muris
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06

8.  What is the role of quality circles in strategies to optimise antibiotic prescribing? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.

Authors:  M L van Driel; S Coenen; K Dirven; J Lobbestael; I Janssens; P Van Royen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp; M De Meyere; J De Maeseneer; T Christiaens
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-06

9.  Why peer assessment helps to improve clinical performance in undergraduate physical therapy education: a mixed methods design.

Authors:  Marjo J M Maas; Dominique M A Sluijsmans; Philip J van der Wees; Yvonne F Heerkens; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Voluntary peer review as innovative tool for quality improvement in the intensive care unit--a retrospective descriptive cohort study in German intensive care units.

Authors:  Oliver Kumpf; Frank Bloos; Hanswerner Bause; Alexander Brinkmann; Maria Deja; Gernot Marx; Arnold Kaltwasser; Rolf Dubb; Elke Muhl; Clemens-A Greim; Norbert Weiler; Ines Chop; Günther Jonitz; Henning Schaefer; Matthias Felsenstein; Ursula Liebeskind; Carsten Leffmann; Annemarie Jungbluth; Christian Waydhas; Peter Pronovost; Claudia Spies; Jan-Peter Braun
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2014-12-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.