Literature DB >> 3977293

Racial differences in the energy cost of standardised activities.

C A Geissler, M S Aldouri.   

Abstract

The assumption is currently made by international organisations that individuals of the same size living in the same environment and having the same mode of living will have the same energy requirements whatever their race. Reports of very low energy intakes are frequently doubted. To investigate possible racial differences the energy cost of standardised activities was measured in European, Asian, and African males under the same experimental conditions. Subjects were closely matched for height, weight and Quetelet index. The energy cost of each activity, lying, sitting and standing, was significantly higher, by 10-17%, in Europeans as compared to Asians and Africans, between whom no differences were found. Whether these differences are morphological or metabolic is discussed. It is concluded that differences in energy requirements do exist over and above those due to body size and activity.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977293     DOI: 10.1159/000176952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab        ISSN: 0250-6807            Impact factor:   3.374


  6 in total

1.  The Role of Energy Intake on Fitness-Adjusted Racial/Ethnic Differences in Central Adiposity Using Quantile Regression.

Authors:  Samantha M McDonald; Andrew Ortaglia; Christina Supino; Matteo Bottai
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-01-17

2.  African American women exhibit similar adherence to intervention but lose less weight due to lower energy requirements.

Authors:  J P DeLany; J M Jakicic; J B Lowery; K C Hames; D E Kelley; B H Goodpaster
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Heterogeneity in the energy cost of posture maintenance during standing relative to sitting: phenotyping according to magnitude and time-course.

Authors:  Jennifer L Miles-Chan; Delphine Sarafian; Jean-Pierre Montani; Yves Schutz; Abdul Dulloo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Smaller genetic risk in catabolic process explains lower energy expenditure, more athletic capability and higher prevalence of obesity in Africans.

Authors:  Cheng Xue; Yun-Xin Fu; Yuhai Zhao; Yun Gong; Xiaoming Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Posture Allocation Revisited: Breaking the Sedentary Threshold of Energy Expenditure for Obesity Management.

Authors:  Jennifer L Miles-Chan; Abdul G Dulloo
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Energy Cost of Standing in a Multi-Ethnic Cohort: Are Energy-Savers a Minority or the Majority?

Authors:  Cathríona R Monnard; Jennifer L Miles-Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.