Literature DB >> 3977119

Epidural blockade for cesarean section comparing lidocaine hydrocarbonate and lidocaine hydrochloride.

C P Cole, G H McMorland, J E Axelson, L C Jenkins.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1985        PMID： 3977119     DOI： 10.1097/00000542-198503000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN： 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Update on obstetrical anaesthesia.

Authors:  D Biehl; R J Palahniuk
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-03

2.  [Peridural anesthesia for surgery of the ankle and foot: effect of the sitting position].

Authors:  P Gosteli; Z Gamulin; E Van Gessel; A Forster
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Comparison of lidocaine CO2, two per cent lidocaine hydrochloride and pH adjusted lidocaine hydrochloride for caesarean section anesthesia.

Authors:  D J Liepert; M J Douglas; G H McMorland; D R Gambling; J H Kim; P L Ross
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of epidural and spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Comparison of lidocaine hydrocarbonate, lidocaine hydrochloride and mepivacaine in the axillary block.

Authors:  R Martin; L Beauregard; Y Lamarche; J P Tétrault
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.063
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.