Literature DB >> 1563058

[Peridural anesthesia for surgery of the ankle and foot: effect of the sitting position].

P Gosteli1, Z Gamulin, E Van Gessel, A Forster.   

Abstract

The effects of the sitting position on the quality of both sensory and motor blockade of segments L5 and S1 and the haemodynamic consequences during epidural anaesthesia were studied on 39 patients undergoing ankle or foot surgery. After insertion of an epidural catheter with the patient in the lateral position, 19 patients were kept sitting for 15 min following the injection of the local anaesthetic and 20 remained supine for the duration of anaesthesia (control group). All patients received a dose of 20 ml of 1.73% carbonated lidocaine with epinephrine 1:200,000. The quality and time of onset of the sensory blockade for segments L1-S2 as well as its cephalad spread were comparable in both groups. Fourteen patients of the sitting group achieved motor blockade of more than three of five myotomes compared with five patients in the supine group (P less than 0.001). The maximum decrease in mean arterial pressure occurred sooner in the sitting group (14 +/- 9 min) than in the control group (21 +/- 10 min; P less than 0.01) and was more severe (-24 +/- 10% vs -16 +/- 10% respectively; P less than 0.05). Our results indicate that placing the patient in the sitting position for 15 min after inducing epidural anaesthesia does not influence caudal sensory blockade but does increase the depth of motor blockade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1563058     DOI: 10.1007/bf03009043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  14 in total

1.  Quality of spinal extradural anaesthesia: the influence of spinal nerve root diameter.

Authors:  A Galindo; J Hernandez; O Benavides; S Ortegon de Munoz; J J Bonica
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  The spread of lidocaine and I-131 solution in the epidural space.

Authors:  N NISHIMURA; T KITAHARA; T KUSAKABE
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1959 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Influence of venous return on baroreflex control of heart rate during lumbar epidural anesthesia in humans.

Authors:  J F Baron; A Decaux-Jacolot; A Edouard; A Berdeaux; K Samii
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 4.  Physiology and pharmacology of epidural analgesia.

Authors:  P R Bromage
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1967 May-Jun       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Effect of gravity on the spread of extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  M C Norris; D M Dewan
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Posture and the spread of extradural analgesia in labour.

Authors:  A F Merry; J A Cross; S V Mayadeo; C J Wild
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  The absence of differential blockade in peridural anaethesia.

Authors:  M Wugmeister; F W Hehre
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of lidocaine hydrocarbonate and lidocaine hydrochloride with and without epinephrine in epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  R Martin; Y Lamarche; L Tétreault
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1981-05

9.  Lidocaine and bupivacaine mixtures for epidural blockade.

Authors:  L T Seow; F J Lips; M J Cousins; L E Mather
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  A double-blind comparison of carbonated lidocaine and lidocaine hydrochloride in epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  D H Morison
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1981-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.