Literature DB >> 3976913

Is gastric sham feeding really sham feeding?

A Sclafani, J W Nissenbaum.   

Abstract

Rats were fitted with gastric cannulas, food deprived, and allowed to drink a sugar solution that drained out of the opened cannula; i.e., the rats sham-fed. Although this procedure is thought to prevent absorption of ingested food, it was found that the sham feeding of a 32% glucose or sucrose solution significantly elevated blood glucose levels. The addition of acarbose, a drug that inhibits the digestion of sucrose, to the 32% sucrose solution blocked the blood glucose rise, as did closing the pylorus with an inflatable pyloric cuff. Neither the drug nor the cuff, however, reduced the amount of sucrose solution consumed. These findings indicate that gastric sham feeding does not necessarily prevent the digestion and absorption of food, although absorption is not essential for the appearance of a vigorous sham-feeding response. Nevertheless the possibility that neural or hormonal feedback from the stomach contributes to the sham-feeding response cannot be excluded, and until this issue is resolved the results of gastric sham-feeding studies should be interpreted with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3976913     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1985.248.3.R387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  5 in total

1.  Altered orosensory sensitivity to oils in CCK-1 receptor deficient rats.

Authors:  T D Swartz; A Hajnal; M Covasa
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-01-12

2.  Pontine and thalamic influences on fluid rewards: III. Anticipatory contrast for sucrose and corn oil.

Authors:  Nu-Chu Liang; Ralph Norgren; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-06-16

3.  Bilateral lesions of the thalamic trigeminal orosensory area dissociate natural from drug reward in contrast paradigms.

Authors:  Jennifer E Nyland; Danielle N Alexander; Nu-Chu Liang; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Genetic variance contributes to dopamine receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Cheryl T Dym; Alexander Pinhas; Magdalena Robak; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 5.  Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake.

Authors:  Nicole M Avena; Pedro Rada; Bartley G Hoebel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 8.989

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.