Literature DB >> 3976583

Publication of research presented at the pediatric meetings. Change in selection.

M C McCormick, J H Holmes.   

Abstract

The adequacy of research presented in abstract form for presentation at scientific meetings remains a concern, as indicated by the proportion of such research appearing in scientific journals after peer review. This report examines the publication of research presented at the pediatrics meetings and the effect of a change in selection procedure for abstracts presented at the Ambulatory Pediatric Association meetings for the years 1979 and 1980. Throughout the period, about half of the presentations were published, usually in general pediatric journals, with an average time to publication of about 20 months. The change in selection procedure resulted in little change in the proportion published among either presentations or abstracts submitted but not selected for presentation, but it did lead to a reduction in time to publication. This experience suggests a mechanism for enhancing the timeliness of publication of research presented at scientific meetings without adversely affecting the process of selection.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3976583     DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140040020017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Dis Child        ISSN: 0002-922X


  12 in total

Review 1.  Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published?

Authors:  F A Riordan
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Presentation in relation to publication of results from clinical trials.

Authors:  Aynur Unalp; Susan Tonascia; Curtis L Meinert
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Attitudes of research ethics board chairs towards disclosure of research results to participants: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S Danielle MacNeil; Conrad V Fernandez
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Publication rate of abstracts presented at the shoulder and elbow session of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Authors:  Philip M DeMola; Derek L Hill; Kenneth Rogers; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Scientific meeting abstracts: significance, access, and trends.

Authors:  J A Kelly
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1998-01

Review 6.  Publication bias in Kienböck's disease: systematic review.

Authors:  Lee Squitieri; Elizabeth Petruska; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 7.  Preparing and presenting effective abstracts and posters in psychiatry.

Authors:  Manpreet K Singh
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-02

8.  Presentation to publication: proportion of abstracts published for ESPR, SPR and IPR.

Authors:  Susan C Shelmerdine; Jeremy O Lynch; Dean Langan; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-07-13

9.  Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Joerg J Meerpohl; Nadine Pfeifer; Christine Schmucker; Guido Schwarzer; Erik von Elm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-20

10.  Publication bias in gastroenterological research - a retrospective cohort study based on abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting.

Authors:  Antje Timmer; Robert J Hilsden; John Cole; David Hailey; Lloyd R Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-04-26       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.