Literature DB >> 397225

Evaluation and comparison of two assays for detection of immunity to rubella infection.

J P Brody, J H Binkley, S A Harding.   

Abstract

Two commercially available rapid screening tests, Rubacell (Abbott Laboratories; passive hemagglutination) and FIAX (International Diagnostic Technology; indirect immunofluorescence) were compared with a standard hemagglutination inhibition assay for detection of immunity to rubella infection. In tests of approximately 300 sera, both rapid assays were specific and sensitive and showed a high predictive value of a positive result. Within-run reproducibility studies were excellent for both tests; however, Rubacell was superior to FIAX with respect to time-cost analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1979        PMID： 397225      PMCID： PMC273252          DOI： 10.1128/jcm.10.5.708-711.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Rubella-virus hemagglutination-inhibition test.

Authors:  G L Stewart; P D Parkman; H E Hopps; R D Douglas; J P Hamilton; H M Meyer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1967-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluation of an immunodiffusion test for screening of rubella immunity.

Authors:  M Grandien; E Norrby
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand C       Date:  1976-04

3.  Variables of the rubella hemagglutination-inhibition test system and their effect on antigen and antibody titers.

Authors:  N J Schmidt; E H Lennette
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-03

4.  Comparison of radial haemolysis with haemagglutination inhibition in estimating rubella antibody.

Authors:  P N Appleton; A D Macrae
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  RUBELLA ANTIBODIES IN HUMAN SERUM: DETECTION BY THE INDIRECT FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIC.

Authors:  G C BROWN; H F MAASSAB; J A VERONELLI; T J FRANCIS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Rubella serology by solid-phase radioimmunoassay: its potential for screening programmes.

Authors:  C Sugishita; S O'Shea; J M Best; J E Banatvala
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  The adsorption of proteins on erythrocytes treated with tannic acid and subsequent hemagglutination by antiprotein sera.

Authors:  S V BOYDEN
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1951-02       Impact factor: 14.307
  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Differences in antibody responses with rapid agglutination tests for the detection of rubella antibodies.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; D J DeLong; J B Mahony; S Castriciano
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of rubella antibodies by hemagglutination inhibition, indirect fluorescent-antibody test, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  M V Zartarian; G Friedly; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Fluoroimmunoassay for detection of rubella-specific immunoglobulin M: comparison with indirect enzyme immunoassay and mu-chain capture.

Authors:  J M Echevarria; F de Ory; R Najera
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay: a new test for rubella antibodies.

Authors:  O H Meurman; I A Hemmilä; T N Lövgren; P E Halonen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.948
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.