Literature DB >> 3970606

Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary?

J J Bauer, I M Gelernt, B A Salky, I Kreel.   

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the need for nasogastric tube decompression and the incidence of complications resulting from its use following major intra-abdominal surgery. To determine the value of such tubes, 100 patients were managed after surgery with a nasogastric tube in situ until the passage of flatus per rectum (Group I). In a second group of 100 patients, no nasogastric tube was placed after surgery unless vomiting, gross distention, or overt obstruction occurred (Group II). In Group I, the nasogastric tube remained in place an average of 6 days and five patients required replacement of the tube after its initial removal. In Group II, nasogastric intubation was required at some point after surgery in six patients. No aspiration pneumonia, nasal septum necrosis, anastomotic leak, or wound dehiscence was seen in either group. There were three wound infections in Group I and two in Group II. The most obvious difference was the increased comfort and mobility of the group of patients treated without routine nasogastric decompression (Group II). Routine use of the nasogastric tube adjunct to patient care following gastrointestinal tract surgery may be safely eliminated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3970606      PMCID: PMC1250647          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198502000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  6 in total

1.  AN EXPERIENCE WITH LOW ANTERIOR RESECTION OF THE RECTUM FOR NEOPLASTIC DISEASE.

Authors:  A W MARINO; A W MARINO
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1964 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  AN APPRAISAL OF PARALYTIC ILEUS AND THE NECESSITY FOR POSTOPERATIVE GASTROINTESTINAL SUCTION.

Authors:  A GERBER
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1963-09

3.  Postoperative decompression by temporary gastrotomy or nasogastric tube. An objective comparison.

Authors:  G N GRANT; D W ELLIOTT; P L FREDERICK
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1962-11

4.  Is postoperative proximal decompression a necessary complement to elective colon resection?

Authors:  A A Ibrahim; D Abrego; I A Issiah; D W Smith
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Gastric decompression after abdominal surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-01-27

6.  Omission of routine gastric decompression.

Authors:  R Burg; C F Geigle; J M Faso; F J Theuerkauf
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 4.585

  6 in total
  18 in total

1.  Fast track colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Counihan; Joanne Favuzza
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 2.  Review of general surgery 1985.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  NASOGASTRIC DECOMPRESSION IN CHOLECYSTECTOMY, IS IT NECESSARY?

Authors:  S Mehrotra; P K Patnaik
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary?

Authors:  F Bozzetti
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  "Fast Track" nasogastric decompression of rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ka Li; Zongguang Zhou; Zengrong Chen; Yi Zhang; Cun Wang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  Current insights in intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome: open the abdomen and keep it open!

Authors:  Inneke E De Laet; Mariska Ravyts; Wesley Vidts; Jody Valk; Jan J De Waele; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25

Review 8.  Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  P Reissman; T A Teoh; S M Cohen; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; S D Wexner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Early oral feeding vs. traditional feeding in patients undergoing elective open bowel surgery-a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Pragatheeswarane; R Muthukumarassamy; D Kadambari; Vikram Kate
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Prophylactic postoperative nasogastric decompression. A prospective study of its requirement and the influence of cimetidine in 200 patients.

Authors:  W G Cheadle; G C Vitale; C R Mackie; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.