Literature DB >> 21964714

"Fast Track" nasogastric decompression of rectal cancer surgery.

Ka Li1, Zongguang Zhou, Zengrong Chen, Yi Zhang, Cun Wang.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the application of fast track (FT) nasogastric decompression in patients who underwent anterior resection of rectal cancer. A randomized control trial was performed comparing the group with the fast track treatment (n = 57) and the group with traditional nasogastric decompression (n = 84). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative recovery indices were recorded and analyzed. The results indicate no significant differences in gender (P = 0.614), age (P = 0.653), tumor location (P = 0.113), and TNM stages (P = 0.054) were observed between the 2 groups. The differences in the type of resection, anastomosis, and adoption of protective colostomy were all not significant between the FT and the traditional group. During the first 24 hours after surgery, the volume of nasogastric drainage averaged 197 ml in the FT group and 155 ml in the traditional group (P = 0.197). The initiation of test-meal (P = 0.000), semiliquid diet (P = 0.002), and ordinary diet (P = 0.008) were all significantly shorter in the FT group. Furthermore, compared with the other group, the patients in the FT group enjoyed earlier removal of the abdominal drainage, urinary catheter, and shorter hospital stays (P = 0.000). Based on a correlation test, the duration of nasogastric decompression is related to the time of test-meal and semiliquid diet. The routine usage of nasogastric decompression in rectal surgery is unnecessary. The fast track procedure might help in facilitating postoperative functional and diet recovery, reducing the time of catheterization, and shortening hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21964714     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-011-0154-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   4.592


  22 in total

1.  Two phase randomised controlled clinical trial of postoperative oral dietary supplements in surgical patients.

Authors:  A M Keele; M J Bray; P W Emery; H D Duncan; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany.

Authors:  Till Hasenberg; Friedrich Längle; Bianca Reibenwein; Karin Schindler; Stefan Post; Claudia Spies; Wolfgang Schwenk; Edward Shang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients' rehabilitation after colorectostomy.

Authors:  Tong Zhou; Xiao-Ting Wu; Ye-Jiang Zhou; Xiong Huang; Wei Fan; Yue-Chun Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  "Fast-track" rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  W Schwenk; J Neudecker; W Raue; O Haase; J M Müller
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations.

Authors:  R Nelson; B Tse; S Edwards
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Is routine postoperative nasogastric decompression really necessary?

Authors:  J J Bauer; I M Gelernt; B A Salky; I Kreel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  R Nelson; S Edwards; B Tse
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

8.  Does the avoidance of nasogastric decompression following elective abdominal colorectal surgery affect the incidence of incisional hernia? Results of a prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  D P Otchy; B G Wolff; J A van Heerden; D M Ilstrup; A L Weaver; L D Winter
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy.

Authors:  M L Cheatham; W C Chapman; S P Key; J L Sawyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  B G Wolff; J H Pembeton; J A van Heerden; R W Beart; S Nivatvongs; R M Devine; R R Dozois; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

1.  Early Oral Feeding After Surgery for Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Saeed Shoar; Mohammad Naderan; Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh; Negin Hosseini-Araghi; Nastaran Mahboobi; Freydoon Sirati; Zhamak Khorgami
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-05

2.  Two-day hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is enhanced recovery program a healthcare system-specific issue?

Authors:  Cun Wang; Hai-Ning Chen; Zong-Guang Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Attitudes towards Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) interventions in colorectal surgery: nationwide survey of Australia and New Zealand colorectal surgeons.

Authors:  James Wei Tatt Toh; Geoffrey Peter Collins; Nimalan Pathma-Nathan; Toufic El-Khoury; Alexander Engel; Stephen Smith; Arthur Richardson; Grahame Ctercteko
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.