Literature DB >> 3969474

Magnetic resonance imaging of prosthetic heart valves.

R L Soulen, T F Budinger, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

To evaluate the safety of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of prosthetic heart valves, nine different synthetic and tissue valves were studied ex vivo. Deflection was measured in 0.35-tesla (T) and 1.5-T superconducting magnets and at the edge of the bore of a 2.35-T electromagnet in field gradients of 5, 1.1, and 6.3 mT/cm, respectively. No valve deflected in the 0.35-T magnet; six synthetic valves deflected 0.25 degrees-3 degrees in the 1.5-T magnet; all valves deflected 1 degree-27 degrees at the edge of the 2.35-T magnet. Each valve was then submerged in a vial of water and the temperature was measured immediately before and after each of two spin-echo imaging sequences in the two superconducting magnets. No significant temperature rise followed exposure in either magnet. Image distortion varied from negligible to severe in both imagers; magnitude of distortion paralleled magnitude of deflection. These data suggest that patients with present-day prosthetic heart valves can be safely imaged in present-day MR imagers and that prosthesis-induced artifacts will not interfere with interpretation in most instances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3969474     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.154.3.3969474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  M Schmidt; J Crnac; B Dederichs; P Theissen; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: structure, function, perfusion, and viability.

Authors:  David C Isbell; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Intraocular lens implants (pseudophakoi) and steelwire sutures: a contraindication for MRI?

Authors:  R J de Keizer; L te Strake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 6.  Diagnostic evaluation of left-sided prosthetic heart valve dysfunction.

Authors:  Jesse Habets; Ricardo P Budde; Petr Symersky; Renee B van den Brink; Bas A de Mol; Willem P Mali; Lex A van Herwerden; Steven A Chamuleau
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Follow-up and management of valvular heart disease patients with prosthetic valve: a clinical practice guideline for Indian scenario.

Authors:  Devendra Saksena; Yugal K Mishra; S Muralidharan; Vivek Kanhere; Pankaj Srivastava; C P Srivastava
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-01-28

8.  Magnetic resonance assessment of aortic and mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  S R Underwood; R H Klipstein; D N Firmin; K M Fox; P A Poole-Wilson; R S Rees; D B Longmore
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-11

Review 9.  MRI in patients with cardiac devices.

Authors:  Edward T Martin; David A Sandler
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.931

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.