Literature DB >> 3967345

Transmission of intrathoracic pressure to the intracranial space during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs.

A D Guerci, A Y Shi, H Levin, J Tsitlik, M L Weisfeldt, N Chandra.   

Abstract

Elevation of intrathoracic pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation generates carotid pressure and flow, but also increases intracranial pressure. This increase in intracranial pressure may limit cerebral blood flow. Therefore, we performed studies designed to quantify the extent of this transmission and to identify the mechanism of transmission of intrathoracic pressure to the intracranial space during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in dogs. Intracranial pressure increased during the chest compression phase of all modes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation tested. During simultaneous compression-ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation, change in intracranial pressure (mm Hg) = 0.33 change in intrathoracic pressure (mm Hg) + 2.02 (r = 0.86) and was not significantly different from the relationship observed during conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The magnitude of transmission of intrathoracic pressure to the intracranial space was increased by binding the abdomen and by raising the baseline intracranial pressure. No single route accounted for transmission of intrathoracic pressure to the intracranial space during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Intracranial pressure fluctuations were unrelated to either carotid arterial or jugular venous pressure, and were found instead to be the result of pressure transmission by blood in non-valved veins and by cerebrospinal fluid. This was determined by three maneuvers. First, obstruction of cerebrospinal fluid flow by ligation of the cervical spinal cord reduced intracranial pressure (P less than 0.001) and made the change in intracranial pressure equivalent to pressure changes at the confluence of the intracranial venous sinuses, without affecting pressure changes at the confluence of the intracranial venous sinuses. Second, ligation of the cervical spinal cord and one of the two longitudinal vertebral veins adjacent to the cervical cord reduced the pressure changes in the intracranial space and at the confluence of the intracranial venous sinuses to about 60% of the levels observed when the cervical cord alone was ligated. Thus, the non-valved longitudinal vertebral veins appear to be the vascular channels of critical importance to pressure transmission. Finally, pressure changes in the thoracic cerebrospinal fluid were increased (P less than 0.05) by cord ligation, even after exsanguination minimized pressure transmission via blood-filled channels, indicating direct transmission of intrathoracic pressure through intervertebral foramina to the cerebrospinal fluid.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3967345     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.56.1.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  20 in total

1.  Cerebrospinal fluid leak associated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  Jean Yared; Jaafar El Annan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-09-07

2.  Obstruction of Venous Drainage Linked to Transient Global Amnesia.

Authors:  Ke Han; A-Ching Chao; Feng-Chi Chang; Chih-Ping Chung; Hung-Yi Hsu; Wen-Yung Sheng; Jiang Wu; Han-Hwa Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mechanics of the circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pathophysiology and techniques (Part II).

Authors:  J Peters; P Ihle
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  From laboratory science to six emergency medical services systems: New understanding of the physiology of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases survival rates after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Carly Alexander; Charles Lick; Brent Myers; Laurie Romig; Levon Vartanian; Joseph Stothert; Scott McKnite; Tim Matsuura; Demetris Yannopoulos; Keith Lurie
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Intrathoracic pressure fluctuations move blood during CPR: comparison of hemodynamic data with predictions from a mathematical model.

Authors:  H R Halperin; J E Tsitlik; R Beyar; N Chandra; A D Guerci
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  The physiology of cerebral blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  I D Berkowitz; M C Rogers
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Improved cerebral perfusion pressures and 24-hr neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure.

Authors:  Anja K Metzger; Margot Herman; Scott McKnite; Wanchun Tang; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Controlled progressive elevation rather than an optimal angle maximizes cerebral perfusion pressure during head up CPR in a swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Michael Lick; Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Nicolas Segal; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 5.262

9.  Effects of mechanical ventilation with expiratory negative airway pressure on porcine pulmonary and systemic circulation: mechano-physiology and potential application.

Authors:  Mihoko Hagiwara-Nagasawa; Ryuichi Kambayashi; Ai Goto; Koki Chiba; Takeshi Wada; Yoshio Nunoi; Hiroko Izumi-Nakaseko; Yoshinori Takei; Akio Matsumoto; Keith G Lurie; Atsushi Sugiyama
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.781

10.  Controlled sequential elevation of the head and thorax combined with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an impedance threshold device improves neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Johanna C Moore; Bayert Salverda; Carolina Rojas-Salvador; Michael Lick; Guillaume Debaty; Keith G Lurie
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.