Literature DB >> 3958322

Psychometric functions for frequency discrimination from listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

D A Nelson, R L Freyman.   

Abstract

Psychometric functions for pulsed pure-tone frequency discrimination were obtained from hearing-impaired listeners at frequencies with normal hearing and at frequencies with mild or moderate hearing losses. The general form of psychometric functions at hearing-impaired frequencies was found to be the same as at normal-hearing frequencies, i.e.,d' was linear with the frequency difference between tones, in Hz. For all but one psychometric function, the addition of an intercept term to the fitting equation did not account for significantly more variance than did the slope term alone. Therefore, it was concluded that psychometric functions for frequency discrimination can be adequately described with only one parameter: the slope of the psychometric function. Deficits in discrimination at hearing-loss frequencies were manifested by more gradual slopes of psychometric functions. Procedures for normalizing psychometric functions are presented, which facilitate comparisons of normal and impaired frequency discrimination data across studies and frequencies. Comparisons of dlf's (difference limen for frequency) obtained with adaptive and fixed procedures show a bias toward larger dlf's with adaptive procedures, but only at higher frequencies. A discussion of equal-interval and equal-ratio adaptive stepping rules indicates that an equal-ratio rule may be preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3958322     DOI: 10.1121/1.393470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Ning-Ji He; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Psychometric functions for pure-tone frequency discrimination.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  An acoustic startle-based method of assessing frequency discrimination in mice.

Authors:  Amanda Clause; Tuan Nguyen; Karl Kandler
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Developmental hearing loss disrupts synaptic inhibition: implications for auditory processing.

Authors:  Anne E Takesian; Vibhakar C Kotak; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2009-05-01

6.  Cross-frequency weights in normal and impaired hearing: Stimulus factors, stimulus dimensions, and associations with speech recognition.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Virginia M Richards; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

7.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Virginia Best; Christine R Mason; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Auditory Temporal Resolution in Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2.

Authors:  Rajkishor Mishra; Himanshu Kumar Sanju; Prawin Kumar
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Hearing-Impaired Listeners Show Reduced Attention to High-Frequency Information in the Presence of Low-Frequency Information.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Judy R Dubno; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.