Literature DB >> 3957533

Terminal digit preference in blood pressure measurements: effects on epidemiological associations.

P A Hessel.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the extent of terminal digit preference in recording blood pressures in an industrial screening programme and its effect on the estimates of the associations between blood pressure and both age and body mass index (BMI). The results showed that 78.5% of systolic and 74.2% of diastolic blood pressure readings were digit preferenced (p less than 0.0001) and that the examining doctors were least likely to preference their readings near the diagnostically important cut-off points of 150 mmHg systolic and 90 mmHg diastolic. Digit preferencing did not generally affect estimates of the slopes and intercepts of the relationships between blood pressure and age or BMI, however, the associations between blood pressure and both age and BMI showed greater error variance when digit preferenced readings were used compared to non-digit preferenced readings. Digit preferencing would have the effect of reducing the power of statistical tests thereby making it more difficult to assess associations between blood pressure and other potential risk factors.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3957533     DOI: 10.1093/ije/15.1.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  13 in total

Review 1.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  T G Pickering
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Evaluating measurement error in readings of blood pressure for adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Shawn Bauldry; Kenneth A Bollen; Linda S Adair
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  The effectiveness of chemoprevention agents is underestimated when lesion sizes are rounded.

Authors:  Thomas H Taylor; William B Armstrong; Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-01-19

4.  How many cigarettes did you smoke? Assessing cigarette consumption by global report, Time-Line Follow-Back, and ecological momentary assessment.

Authors:  Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Comparing the effects of white coat hypertension and sustained hypertension on mortality in a UK primary care setting.

Authors:  Martin G Dawes; Gillian Bartlett; Andrew J Coats; Edmund Juszczak
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  End digit preference in blood pressure measurement in a hypertension specialty clinic in southwest Nigeria.

Authors:  O E Ayodele; E O Sanya; O O Okunola; A A Akintunde
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.167

7.  Reliability of measurements performed by community-drawn anthropometrists from rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Berhan Ayele; Abaineh Aemere; Teshome Gebre; Zerihun Tadesse; Nicole E Stoller; Craig W See; Sun N Yu; Bruce D Gaynor; Charles E McCulloch; Travis C Porco; Paul M Emerson; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identifying temporal variation in reported births, deaths and movements of cattle in Britain.

Authors:  Susan E Robinson; Rob M Christley
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2006-03-30       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Challenges in standardization of blood pressure measurement at the population level.

Authors:  Hanna Tolonen; Päivikki Koponen; Androniki Naska; Satu Männistö; Grazyna Broda; Tarja Palosaari; Kari Kuulasmaa
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Manual or automated sphygmomanometer? A historical cohort to quantify measurement bias in blood pressure recording.

Authors:  Arash A Nargesi; Zaniar Ghazizadeh; Mehrdad Larry; Afsaneh Morteza; Firuzeh Heidari; Firuzeh Asgarani; Alireza Esteghamati; Kazem Mohammad; Manouchehr Nakhjavani
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.