Literature DB >> 3955334

Computer-assisted myelography in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Clinical correlations and pathogenetic mechanisms.

Y L Yu, G H du Boulay, J M Stevens, B E Kendall.   

Abstract

A total of 53 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy were studied with computer-assisted myelography following metrizamide myelography. Cervical cord deformities resulting from spondylotic protrusions were classified into four groups. The A shape (anterior central concavity) is the commonest and is often associated clinically with bilateral anterolateral and posterior column deficits. In the B shape (lateral deformity on one side), unilateral anterolateral column and root signs, usually mild, predominate. The symptomatology of the C shape (lateral deformity on both sides) and the D shape (flattened anterior surface) is bilateral, although not often symmetrical, and includes anterolateral and posterior column disturbances and root signs. Radiculopathy may, however, occur in the absence of cord deformity if the spondylotic lesion is close to or inside the intervertebral foramen. As there is some relationship between cord shapes and symptomatology, the decision as to whether a particular deformity is responsible for the clinical presentation may be made with more confidence. Moreover, the degree of cord deformity correlates well with the severity of symptomatology. Those with mild deformity had relatively few or mild cord signs, whereas in those with severe deformity cord signs were numerous and severe. Certain observations on cord deformity in vivo support the view that compression is an important pathogenetic mechanism in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Most patients had anterior cord compression and the anterolateral signs were more frequent and marked. Severity of cord signs is associated with the degree of compression. Removal of the compression is followed by re-expansion of the cord and clinical improvement. In a small number of cases where cord compression by osteophytic protrusion was mild, and where clinical improvement followed the removal of the protrusion, the theory of cord traction and friction appears to apply. The contribution of other mechanical factors and of ischaemia to cord damage is also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3955334     DOI: 10.1093/brain/109.2.259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  7 in total

1.  MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Authors:  R J V Bartlett; C A Rowland Hill; A S Rigby; S Chandrasekaran; H Narayanamurthy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Combined use of spin-echo and gradient-echo MR-imaging in cervical disk disease. Comparison with myelography and intraoperative findings.

Authors:  A Neuhold; M Stiskal; C Platzer; G Pernecky; M Brainin
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Imaging of the spinal cord.

Authors:  J M Stevens
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Electrical stimulation of the motor tracts in cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; D Dall'Agata; M Morena; S Simonetti; L Spadavecchia; P Severi; G C Andrioli; E Favale
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Neuropathology of the brainstem and spinal cord in end stage rheumatoid arthritis: implications for treatment.

Authors:  F C Henderson; J F Geddes; H A Crockard
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Some dynamic factors in compressive deformity of the cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  J M Stevens; D M O'Driscoll; Y L Yu; B E Kendall; S Anathapavan
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated predictive model.

Authors:  Josef Bednarik; Zdenek Kadanka; Ladislav Dusek; Milos Kerkovsky; Stanislav Vohanka; Oldrich Novotny; Igor Urbanek; Dagmar Kratochvilova
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.