| Literature DB >> 3953871 |
Abstract
A recent Vermont Supreme Court decision adopts and extends the Tarasoff precedent. This paper emphasizes three aspects of the new precedent that are of possible consequence to providers of mental health care. First, the decision imposes the Tarasoff duty on all "mental health professionals". Second, it demonstrates a legal scenario that in effect permits a single standard of care to be applied to all mental health professionals. Third, it creates liability for property damage as well as for personal injury.Entities:
Keywords: Legal Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Peck v. Counseling Service of Addison County; Professional Patient Relationship; Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California
Mesh:
Year: 1986 PMID: 3953871 DOI: 10.1176/ajp.143.3.352
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Psychiatry ISSN: 0002-953X Impact factor: 18.112