Literature DB >> 3348040

The duty to protect others from your patients--Tarasoff spreads to the Northwest.

J D Bloom, J L Rogers.   

Abstract

The California Supreme Court's Tarasoff decision was the seminal case in the area of the duty to protect third parties from the potential of violence from patients. Tarasoff-related issues have now spread to many jurisdictions in the country. This article will pay particular attention to the cases influencing law in Washington and Oregon and will review the clinical duty to protect others from your patients that existed before Tarasoff, as physicians were taught to work between privilege and civil commitment statutes. The California law designed to limit Tarasoff liability and the reasons why legislators should be willing to support such legislation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3348040      PMCID: PMC1026085     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  4 in total

1.  Oregon's Psychiatric Security Review Board: a comprehensive system for managing insanity acquittees.

Authors:  J L Rogers; J D Bloom; S M Manson
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  1986

2.  Protecting third parties: a decade after Tarasoff.

Authors:  M J Mills; G Sullivan; S Eth
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Vermont adopts Tarasoff: a real barn-burner.

Authors:  A A Stone
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  After Oregon's insanity defense: a comparison of conditional release and hospitalization.

Authors:  J D Bloom; J L Rogers; S M Manson
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.