Literature DB >> 3947877

Indicators of surgical risk and clinical judgement.

R A Pettigrew, G L Hill.   

Abstract

A number of indicators of surgical risk were measured in 218 patients awaiting major gastrointestinal surgery. The indices chosen had been used by others to identify high risk patients and they were compared with each other and with two clinical assessments of risk, one by the operating surgeon and the other by an independent clinician who performed a complete physical examination. Anthropometric indices did not pick out patients who were significantly at high risk but the plasma proteins (albumin, pre-albumin, transferrin) identified subgroups of high risk patients, about a third of whom developed major postoperative complications. Although some nutritional indicators which use plasma proteins for the computation selected patients who were significantly more at risk, some (20-30 per cent) of the patients with low levels of plasma proteins (particularly those who were septic) did not have depleted fat or muscle protein stores. Although the surgeons were able correctly to identify only a small number of very high risk patients the results showed that a carefully performed clinical examination was able to do this as effectively as the plasma proteins. It is suggested that something more than a global assessment by the operating surgeon is required to identify high risk patients. A careful assessment of medical risk noting in particular cardiorespiratory disease and pre-existing sepsis, as well as nutritional state, is as effective as any other currently used indicator of risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3947877     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800730121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  21 in total

1.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Melanie Chan; Nihal Sinha; Richard A Harrison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  How and why do we measure surgical risk?

Authors:  Manish Chand; Tom Armstrong; Greg Britton; Guy F Nash
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  A Karliczek; N J Harlaar; C J Zeebregts; T Wiggers; P C Baas; G M van Dam
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Mechanisms of decision-making in preoperative assessment for older adult prostate cancer patients-A qualitative study.

Authors:  Patrick Kierkegaard; Mira D Vale; Spencer Garrison; Brent K Hollenbeck; John M Hollingsworth; Jason Owen-Smith
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Fast-track rehabilitation program and conventional care after esophagectomy: a retrospective controlled cohort study.

Authors:  Shouqiang Cao; Guibin Zhao; Jian Cui; Qing Dong; Sihua Qi; Yanzhong Xin; Baozhong Shen; Qingfeng Guo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Freek Daams; Zhouqiao Wu; Max Jef Lahaye; Johannus Jeekel; Johan Frederik Lange
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-27

8.  Malnutrition and surgical risk: guidelines for nutritional therapy.

Authors:  G L Hill
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Predicting morbidity of liver resection.

Authors:  Sudharsan Madhavan; Vishal G Shelat; Su-Lin Soong; Winston W L Woon; Terence Huey; Yiong H Chan; Sameer P Junnarkar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Risk analysis in resection of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.