Literature DB >> 3946955

Pressure to publish and fraud in science.

P K Woolf.   

Abstract

Pressure to publish is an overworked and ill-used phrase that encompasses at least two meanings: the pressure an individual scientist may feel, and the pressure exerted by the institutions of science. It is important not to confuse the two. A modest level of institutional pressure is legitimate and healthy for science. Persons who respond to these pressures by publishing extravagantly may be doing a disservice to impressionable young colleagues and to the notions of responsible authorship.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3946955     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-2-254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  12 in total

1.  The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?

Authors:  James S Lubalin; Jennifer L Matheson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Reforming science: methodological and cultural reforms.

Authors:  Arturo Casadevall; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Ethical considerations relating to writing a medical scientific paper for publication.

Authors:  P Steinbok
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Preventing scientific misconduct.

Authors:  D L Weed
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Wind of change. II. Medical journals in Britain in 1988.

Authors:  V C Medvei
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Fraud in medicine.

Authors:  S Lock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-02-06

7.  Is it worth writing about?

Authors:  J T Scott
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  The Search for Significance: A Few Peculiarities in the Distribution of P Values in Experimental Psychology Literature.

Authors:  Michał Krawczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Significance bias: an empirical evaluation of the oral health literature.

Authors:  Edwin Kagereki; Joseph Gakonyo; Hazel Simila
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Perceived publication pressure in Amsterdam: Survey of all disciplinary fields and academic ranks.

Authors:  Tamarinde L Haven; Lex M Bouter; Yvo M Smulders; Joeri K Tijdink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.