Literature DB >> 11657861

The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?

James S Lubalin, Jennifer L Matheson.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Office of Research Integrity; Research Triangle Institute

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 11657861     DOI： 10.1007/s11948-999-0014-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN： 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Deception in scientific research.

Authors:  Patricia K Woolf
Journal:  Jurimetrics       Date:  1988

2.  Ethical issues in biomedical research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey.

Authors:  Susan Eastwood; Pamela Derish; Evangeline Leash; Stephen Ordway
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics.

Authors:  M W Kalichman; P J Friedman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Pressure to publish and fraud in science.

Authors:  P K Woolf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Fraud in science: how much, how serious?

Authors:  P Woolf
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 2.683
  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends.

Authors:  Barbara Mishkin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Publicizing scientific misconduct and its consequences.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Whistleblowing in academic medicine.

Authors:  R Rhodes; J J Strain
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  On blacklisting in science.

Authors:  Michael J Kuhar
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities.

Authors:  Erisa S Mwaka
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 0.927

6.  Blacklisting among scientists.

Authors:  Michael J Kuhar
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Collegial ethics: supporting our colleagues.

Authors:  Michael J Kuhar; Dorthie Cross
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Scientific misconduct and accountability in teams.

Authors:  Katrin Hussinger; Maikel Pellens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing.

Authors:  Knut Jørgen Vie
Journal:  Life Sci Soc Policy       Date:  2020-08-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.