Literature DB >> 3943947

Human orientation discrimination: changes with eccentricity in normal and amblyopic vision.

E Vandenbussche, R Vogels, G A Orban.   

Abstract

The authors measured orientation discrimination of a single line as a function of eccentricity, line length, and standard orientation. Orientation discrimination improved with increasing line length at all eccentricities. The shortest length at which orientation discrimination was optimal increased with eccentricity. When a line length was used for which discrimination was optimal at all eccentricities, it was found that orientation discrimination performance changed little with increasing eccentricity. Under the same conditions, the oblique effect in orientation discrimination decreased with increasing eccentricity. Similar results were also obtained in both eyes of strabismic amblyopes. The difference between the just noticeable differences in orientation of the amblyopic and nonamblyopic eye decreased with increasing line length for central vision. This interocular difference also decreased with increasing eccentricity. The absence of the oblique effect in orientation discrimination at large eccentricities support the hypothesis that the area 17 S-cell orientation anisotropy underlies the oblique effect in orientation discrimination of long lines since this sensorial anisotropy is limited to the central visual field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3943947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  The influence of cortical feature maps on the encoding of the orientation of a short line.

Authors:  K N Shokhirev; T Kumar; D A Glaser
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Unequal representation of cardinal vs. oblique orientations in the middle temporal visual area.

Authors:  Xiangmin Xu; Christine E Collins; Ilya Khaytin; Jon H Kaas; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Foveal and extra-foveal orientation discrimination.

Authors:  Sharon L Sally; Rick Gurnsey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Positional averaging explains crowding with letter-like stimuli.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Infants' visual system nonretinotopically integrates color signals along a motion trajectory.

Authors:  Jiale Yang; Junji Watanabe; So Kanazawa; Shin'ya Nishida; Masami K Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Decision factors affecting line orientation judgments in the method of single stimuli.

Authors:  R Vogels; G A Orban
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-08

7.  Push-pull training reduces foveal sensory eye dominance within the early visual channels.

Authors:  Jingping P Xu; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual perception of upright: Head tilt, visual errors and viewing eye.

Authors:  Amir Kheradmand; Grisel Gonzalez; Jorge Otero-Millan; Adrian Lasker
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Estimation of cortical magnification from positional error in normally sighted and amblyopic subjects.

Authors:  Zahra Hussain; Carl-Magnus Svensson; Julien Besle; Ben S Webb; Brendan T Barrett; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Demonstration of tuning to stimulus orientation in the human visual cortex: a high-resolution fMRI study with a novel continuous and periodic stimulation paradigm.

Authors:  Pei Sun; Justin L Gardner; Mauro Costagli; Kenichi Ueno; R Allen Waggoner; Keiji Tanaka; Kang Cheng
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.