Literature DB >> 3943667

Analysis of a multiphasic radiographic examination for detecting reflux esophagitis.

D J Ott, Y M Chen, D W Gelfand, H A Munitz, W C Wu.   

Abstract

Radiographic and endoscopic findings were correlated in 46 normal patients and in 49 with reflux esophagitis to assess the efficacy of a multiphasic examination employing mucosal relief full-column, and double-contrast techniques. Esophagitis was graded endoscopically as mild, moderate, or severe, and the quality and sensitivity of each technique and of the examination as a whole were determined. The radiographic specificity in the normal patients was 98%. The overall sensitivity was 65% for all grades of esophagitis, and 90% for the moderate and severe grades. Sensitivities of the individual techniques were: mucosal relief: 43%; full-column: 53%; double-contrast: 45%. These differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that a combination of radiographic techniques is needed to detect reflux esophagitis optimally.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3943667     DOI: 10.1007/BF02035022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2356


  13 in total

1.  Endoscopic signs for gastroesophageal reflux objectively evaluated.

Authors:  L F Johnson; T R DeMeester; R C Haggitt
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Evaluation of esophageal tests in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  J Behar; P Biancani; D G Sheahan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Gastroscopic evaluation of the esophago-gastric junctional area.

Authors:  N P Trujillo; H W Boyce
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  The tube esophagram: a technique for obtaining a detailed double-contrast examination of the esophagus.

Authors:  M S Levine; H Y Kressel; I Laufer; H Herlinger; R Goren
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Single- and double-contrast techniques in esophagitis.

Authors:  R E Koehler; P J Weyman; H F Oakley
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Current status of radiology in evaluating for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D J Ott; W J Dodds; W C Wu; D W Gelfand; W J Hogan; E T Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Routine air-contrast esophagography during upper gastrointestinal examinations.

Authors:  D M Balfe; R E Koehler; P J Weyman; R L Baron; W R Reinus
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Reflux esophagitis revisited: prospective analysis of radiologic accuracy.

Authors:  D J Ott; W C Wu; D W Gelfand
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1981-01-15

10.  Double-contrast esophagrams. The prone technique.

Authors:  D M Cassel; M F Anderson; F F Zboralske
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Radiographic techniques and efficacy in evaluating esophageal dysphagia.

Authors:  D J Ott
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Effects of hiatal hernia, reflux esophagitis, and glucagon on the quality of double-contrast esophagram.

Authors:  D J Ott; Y M Chen; D W Gelfand
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

3.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease: medical or surgical treatment?

Authors:  Theodore Liakakos; George Karamanolis; Paul Patapis; Evangelos P Misiakos
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 2.260

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.