Literature DB >> 6361

Evaluation of esophageal tests in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis.

J Behar, P Biancani, D G Sheahan.   

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of each of five esophageal tests used in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis were compared with those of six combinations of two tests, one indicating esophagitis and the other indicating sphincter incompetence. The esophageal tests were performed in patients with reflux symptoms, chest pain, and esophagitis without reflux symptoms. Control data were obtained from normal subjects (negative control) and duodenal ulcer patients (positive control). The results indicate that the acid infusion test and esophageal biopsy combined with esophageal pH study after HC1 have similar sensitivity and greater specificity than any test alone. In normal subjects, the cumulative incidence of abnormalities with esophageal tests alone was 30%, but with combinations of two tests it was only 5%. The use of criteria (simultaneous esophagitis and sphincter incompetence) which establish the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis helps to resolve conflicting results obtained with single tests. The most sensitive and specific test combination for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis appears to be esophageal biopsy with esophageal pH study after HC1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 6361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  49 in total

1.  Fat and esophageal sensitivity to acid.

Authors:  Maria Mangano; Paola Colombo; Paolo A Bianchi; Roberto Penagini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Genetic influences in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a twin study.

Authors:  I Mohammed; L F Cherkas; S A Riley; T D Spector; N J Trudgill
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Acid perfusion and edrophonium provocation tests in patients with chest pain of undetermined etiology.

Authors:  T Rokkas; A Anggiansah; M McCullagh; W J Owen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Symptom association analysis in ambulatory gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring.

Authors:  A J Bredenoord; B L A M Weusten; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Double blind cross-over placebo controlled study of omeprazole in the treatment of patients with reflux symptoms and physiological levels of acid reflux--the "sensitive oesophagus".

Authors:  R G Watson; T C Tham; B T Johnston; N I McDougall
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Acupuncture for functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Authors:  Toku Takahashi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  The role of esophageal motility and hiatal hernia in esophageal exposure to acid.

Authors:  E S Xenos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Contemplating the future without Helicobacter pylori and the dire consequences hypothesis.

Authors:  David Y Graham; Yoshio Yamaoka; Hoda M Malaty
Journal:  Helicobacter       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Acid perfusion test: does it have a role in the assessment of non cardiac chest pain?

Authors:  E G Hewson; J W Sinclair; C B Dalton; W C Wu; D O Castell; J E Richter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Toni Beninato; Brian P Bosworth; Laurent Brunaud; Thomas Ciecierega; Carl V Crawford; Brian G Turner; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.