Importance of modes of electrical termination of ventricular tachycardia for the selection of implantable antitachycardia devices.

Different implantable systems for electrical treatment of ventricular arrhythmias are available. Information about mode of termination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) helps to select the most appropriate electrical treatment for drug-resistant VT. During 158 electrophysiologic studies, the mode of termination of 215 episodes of VT was analyzed in 2 groups of patients. Group 1 consisted of 54 patients with documented monomorphic VT and group 2 of 46 patients with other documented or suspected ventricular arrhythmias. Eighty-two patients had coronary heart disease, 8 had other structural heart disease and 10 had idiopathic VT. Termination of VT was attempted using extrastimuli and overdrive pacing; direct-current (DC) shocks were given in case of syncopal VT. During 33 of 96 studies (34%) in group 1, DC shock was required to interrupt VT, compared with 45 of 62 studies (73%) in group 2 (p less than 0.001). This difference was a result of less frequent induction of immediately syncopal VT in group 1 (14 of 129 VTs, vs 40 of 86 in group 2, p less than 0.001). Non-syncopal VT could reliably and safely be terminated by pacing in 61%, irrespective of the clinical arrhythmia. Pacing-induced acceleration of VT occurred in 6% (single extrastimuli) to 36% (over-drive pacing) (mean 26%) of attempts. Subsequent DC shock was required in half of these cases. Immediate collapse after induction of VT was not related to the presence of heart disease, but was related to a combination of VT cycle length (shorter than 260 ms) and left ventricular ejection fraction (less than 40%). Antiarrhythmic drugs reduced the need for DC shock.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)