Literature DB >> 26611239

The precise timing of tachycardia entrainment is determined by the postpacing interval, the tachycardia cycle length, and the pacing rate: Theoretical insights and practical applications.

Daniel W Kaiser1, Henry H Hsia2, Anne M Dubin3, L Bing Liem4, Mohan N Viswanathan3, Paul C Zei3, Paul J Wang3, Sanjiv M Narayan3, Mintu P Turakhia5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous observations have reported that the number of pacing stimuli required to entrain a tachycardia varies on the basis of arrhythmia type and location, but a quantitative formulation of the number needed to entrain (NNE) that unifies these observations has not been characterized.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the relationship between the number of pacing stimulations, the tachycardia cycle length (TCL), the overdrive pacing cycle length (PCL), and the postpacing interval (PPI) to accurately estimate the timing of tachycardia entrainment.
METHODS: First, we detailed a mathematical derivation unifying electrophysiological parameters with empirical confirmation in 2 patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. Second, we validated our formula in 44 patients who underwent various catheter ablation procedures. For accuracy, we corrected for rate-related changes in conduction velocity.
RESULTS: We derived the equations NNE = |(PPI - TCL)/(TCL - PCL)| + 1 and Tachycardia advancement = (NNE - 1) × (TCL - PCL) - (PPI - TCL), which state that the NNE and the amount of tachycardia advancement on the first resetting stimulation are determined using regularly measured intracardiac parameters. In the retrospective cohort, the observed PPI - TCL highly correlated with the predicted PPI - TCL (mean difference 5.8 ms; r = 0.97; P < .001), calculated as PPI - TCL = (NNE - 1) × (TCL - PCL) - tachycardia advancement.
CONCLUSION: The number of pacing stimulations required to entrain a reentrant tachycardia is predictable at any PCL after correcting for cycle length-dependent changes in conduction velocity. This relationship unifies established empirically derived diagnostic and mapping criteria for supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia. This relationship may help elucidate when antitachycardia pacing episodes are ineffective or proarrhythmic and could potentially serve as a theoretical basis to customize antitachycardia pacing settings for improved safety and effectiveness.
Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antitachycardia pacing; Arrhythmia; Catheter ablation; Entrainment; Number needed to entrain; Right ventricular overdrive pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26611239      PMCID: PMC4770895          DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.11.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  20 in total

1.  Differentiation of atypical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia from orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia using a septal accessory pathway by the response to ventricular pacing.

Authors:  G F Michaud; H Tada; S Chough; R Baker; K Wasmer; C Sticherling; H Oral; F Pelosi; B P Knight; S A Strickberger; F Morady
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Resetting and entrainment of reentrant ventricular tachycardia associated with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mark E Josephson; Jesus Almendral; David J Callans
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Reentrant ventricular arrhythmias in the late myocardial infarction period: 14. Mechanisms of resetting, entrainment, acceleration, or termination of reentrant tachycardia by programmed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  N el-Sherif; W B Gough; M Restivo
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.976

4.  Number needed to entrain: a new criterion for entrainment mapping in patients with intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Mitsunori Maruyama; Teppei Yamamoto; Junko Abe; Kenji Yodogawa; Yoshihiko Seino; Hirotsugu Atarashi; Wataru Shimizu
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-04-24

5.  The N + 1 difference: a new measure for entrainment mapping.

Authors:  K Soejima; W G Stevenson; W H Maisel; E Delacretaz; C B Brunckhorst; K E Ellison; P L Friedman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Entrainment and interruption of atrial flutter with atrial pacing: studies in man following open heart surgery.

Authors:  A L Waldo; W A MacLean; R B Karp; N T Kouchoukos; T N James
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prospective randomized multicenter trial of empirical antitachycardia pacing versus shocks for spontaneous rapid ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Pacing Fast Ventricular Tachycardia Reduces Shock Therapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial results.

Authors:  Mark S Wathen; Paul J DeGroot; Michael O Sweeney; Alice J Stark; Mary F Otterness; Wayne O Adkisson; Robert C Canby; Koroush Khalighi; Christian Machado; Donald S Rubenstein; Kent J Volosin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  A novel approach to differentiating orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia from atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  Gopi Dandamudi; Rasoul Mokabberi; Chafik Assal; Mithilesh K Das; Jess Oren; Randle Storm; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; John M Miller
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  The preexcitation index: an aid in determining the mechanism of supraventricular tachycardia and localizing accessory pathways.

Authors:  W M Miles; R Yee; G J Klein; D P Zipes; E N Prystowsky
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Importance of modes of electrical termination of ventricular tachycardia for the selection of implantable antitachycardia devices.

Authors:  B Waldecker; P Brugada; M Zehender; W Stevenson; K Den Dulk; H J Wellens
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-01-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Could predicted post-pacing interval from theoretical mathematical formula replace the observed post-pacing interval in clinical practice?

Authors:  Chin-Yu Lin; Li-Wei Lo; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Predictability in complex atrial arrhythmias: The N/N-1 algorithm to guide ablation of atrial tachycardias.

Authors:  Daniel W Kaiser; Albert J Rogers; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 6.779

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.