Literature DB >> 3940915

Role of thought, sight, smell, and taste of food in the cephalic phase of gastric acid secretion in humans.

M Feldman, C T Richardson.   

Abstract

The relative importance of thought, sight, smell, and taste of food in the cephalic phase of gastric acid secretion has not been studied systematically. We found that discussing appetizing food for 30 min (without sight, smell, or taste) increased acid secretion from 4 to 13 mmol/h in healthy human subjects (p less than 0.001) and also increased serum gastrin concentrations significantly (p less than 0.02). Discussing food resulted in an acid secretory response that averaged 66% +/- 10% of the response to modified sham feeding, which activates thought, sight, smell, and taste. Discussing topics other than food (e.g., current events, sports) did not increase acid secretion significantly. The sight of appetizing food (without smell or taste), the smell of appetizing food (without sight or taste), or the combination of sight and smell (without taste) also increased acid secretion and serum gastrin concentrations significantly. However, sight and smell were significantly less potent stimulants of acid secretion than sham feeding, with responses averaging only 23%-46% of the response to sham feeding. These studies indicate that thinking about food is a potent stimulant of gastric secretion in healthy humans. Moreover, the sight and smell of food increase gastric acid secretion and serum gastrin concentrations, probably by provoking thoughts related to food.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3940915     DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(86)90943-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  39 in total

Review 1.  Anticipatory physiological regulation in feeding biology: cephalic phase responses.

Authors:  Michael L Power; Jay Schulkin
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  The effect of sham feeding on neurocardiac regulation in healthy human volunteers.

Authors:  M V Kamath; R Spaziani; S Ullal; G Tougas; J C Guzman; C Morillo; J Capogna; Mohammed Al-Bayati; David Armstrong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Role of brainstem TRH/TRH-R1 receptors in the vagal gastric cholinergic response to various stimuli including sham-feeding.

Authors:  Y Taché; H Yang; M Miampamba; V Martinez; P Q Yuan
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 3.145

Review 4.  The endocrinology of food intake.

Authors:  Denovan P Begg; Stephen C Woods
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  Odors: appetizing or satiating? Development of appetite during odor exposure over time.

Authors:  M G Ramaekers; S Boesveldt; C M M Lakemond; M A J S van Boekel; P A Luning
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Sham Feeding with Bacon Does Not Alter Transit Time or Complete Examination Rate During Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  David Prichard; George Ou; Cherry Galorport; Robert Enns
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Colonic responses to enteral tube feeding.

Authors:  T E Bowling; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Sham feeding. Cephalic-vagal influences on gastric myoelectric activity.

Authors:  R M Stern; H E Crawford; W R Stewart; M W Vasey; K L Koch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Cephalic phase of colonic pressure response to food.

Authors:  J Rogers; A H Raimundo; J J Misiewicz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Successful weight loss surgery improves eating control and energy metabolism: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Dave H Schweitzer; Emile F Dubois; Niki van den Doel-Tanis; Hok I Oei
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.