Literature DB >> 8491403

Cephalic phase of colonic pressure response to food.

J Rogers1, A H Raimundo, J J Misiewicz.   

Abstract

A cephalic phase of colonic pressure response to food was sought in five normal subjects (mean age (22.6) years, 22-24), studied on six separate occasions by recording intraluminal pressures in the unprepared sigmoid colon. Gastric acid secretion was measured simultaneously by continuous aspiration through a nasogastric tube. After a 60 minute basal period, one of five 30 minute food related cephalic stimuli, or a control stimulus was given in random order; records were continued for a further 120 minutes. The cephalic stimuli were: food discussion, sight and smell of food without taste, smell of food without sight or taste, sight of food without smell or taste, and modified sham feeding; the control stimulus was a discussion of neutral topics. Colonic pressures were expressed as study segment activity index (area under curve, mm Hg.min) derived by fully automated computer analysis. Gastric acid output was expressed as mmol/30 min. Food discussion significantly (p < 0.02, Wilcoxon's rank sum test) increased colonic pressure activity compared with control or basal activity. Smell of food without sight or taste also significantly (p < 0.03) increased the colonic pressure activity compared with control and basal periods. Sham feeding and sight and smell of food without taste significantly (p < 0.02 and p < 0.03) increased colonic pressures compared with control but not basal activity. The increase in colonic activity after sight of food without smell or taste was not significantly different from control or basal activity (p = 0.44 and p = 0.34). Food discussion was the strongest colonic stimulus tested. Food discussion and sham feeding significantly (p<0.02) stimulated gastric acid output above control and basal values. Sight and smell of food without taste significantly (p<0.02) increased acid output above basal. Smell of food without sight or taste and sight of food without smell or taste did not significantly (p=0.06, p=0.34) increase acid output. In contrast with the effect on colonic pressures, sham feeding was the best stimulus of acid output. Increased colonic pressure activity after food discussion correlated significantly (r=0.45, p<0.02) with gastric acid output. There was no correlation (r=-0.1, p>0.5) between colonic pressure activity and gastric acid output in the control study. These data show that there is a cephalic phase of the colonic response to food.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8491403      PMCID: PMC1374317          DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.4.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  15 in total

1.  THE MOTILITY OF THE PELVIC COLON FOLLOWING COMPLETE LESIONS OF THE SPINAL CORD.

Authors:  A M CONNELL; H FRANKEL; L GUTTMANN
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1963-09

2.  Fully automated computer analysis of intracolonic pressures.

Authors:  J Rogers; J J Misiewicz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  The effect of elevated body temperature and of stress on the motility of stomach and colon in man.

Authors:  J J Misiewicz; S L Waller; R H Fox; R Goldsmith; T J Hunt
Journal:  Clin Sci       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 6.124

4.  The gastrocolic response: evidence for a neural mechanism.

Authors:  W J Snape; S H Wright; W M Battle; S Cohen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Effect of dietary components on gastrocolonic response.

Authors:  S H Wright; W J Snape; W Battle; S Cohen; R L London
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-03

6.  Increased segmental activity and intraluminal pressures in the sigmoid colon of patients with the irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  J Rogers; M M Henry; J J Misiewicz
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Twenty four hour manometric recording of colonic motor activity in healthy man.

Authors:  F Narducci; G Bassotti; M Gaburri; A Morelli
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  The role of opiate receptors and cholinergic neurons in the gastrocolonic response.

Authors:  E A Sun; W J Snape; S Cohen; A Renny
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Inhibition of postprandial colonic motility after ingestion of an amino acid mixture.

Authors:  W M Battle; S Cohen; W J Snape
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Human interdigestive motility: variations in patterns from esophagus to colon.

Authors:  J E Kellow; T J Borody; S F Phillips; R L Tucker; A C Haddad
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  The irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  C Y Francis; P J Whorwell
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Colonic responses to enteral tube feeding.

Authors:  T E Bowling; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Proximal colonic motility.

Authors:  S J Cole; A H Raimundo; D B Silk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Effects of fat and carbohydrate meals on colonic motor response.

Authors:  S S Rao; R Kavelock; J Beaty; K Ackerson; P Stumbo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Differences in colonic tone and phasic response to a meal in the transverse and sigmoid human colon.

Authors:  M J Ford; M Camilleri; J A Wiste; R B Hanson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Characteristics of Intestinal Myoelectrical and Motor Activities in Diet-Induced Obese Rats: Obesity and Motility.

Authors:  Xinyue Wan; Jieyun Yin; Jiande Chen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Is the colonic response to food different in IBS in contrast to simple constipation or diarrhea without abdominal pain?

Authors:  Michel Bouchoucha; Ghislain Devroede; Jean-Jacques Raynaud; Cyriaque Bon; Bakhtiar Bejou; Robert Benamouzig
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Human colonic motility: physiological aspects.

Authors:  G Bassotti; U Germani; A Morelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Omeprazole enhances efficacy of triple therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  T J Borody; P Andrews; G Fracchia; S Brandl; N P Shortis; H Bae
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Understanding the physiology of human defaecation and disorders of continence and evacuation.

Authors:  Paul T Heitmann; Paul F Vollebregt; Charles H Knowles; Peter J Lunniss; Phil G Dinning; S Mark Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 46.802

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.