Literature DB >> 3939244

The antidromic activation of tectal neurons by electrical stimuli applied to the caudal medulla oblongata in the toad, Bufo bufo L.

M Satou, J P Ewert.   

Abstract

In order to specify the tectal projection to the bulbar/spinal regions, the antidromic responses of the physiologically identified tectal neurons as well as the gross antidromic field responses in the optic tectum to electrical stimuli applied to the caudal medulla were examined in the paralyzed common toad, Bufo bufo. The antidromic field potential was recorded in the optic tectum in response to electrical stimuli applied to the ventral paramedian portion of the contralateral caudal medulla (where the crossed tecto-spinal pathway of Rubinson (1968) and Lázár (1969) runs), but generally not when they were applied to various parts of the ipsilateral caudal medulla. The antidromic field potential was largest at the superficial part of Layer 6 or at the border between Layers 6 and 7 of the optic tectum, indicating that neurons in these layers project to the contralateral caudal medulla. Mapping experiments of the antidromic field potential over the optic tectum showed that the antidromic field potential was recorded mainly in the lateral part of it, indicating that this part of the optic tectum is the main source of projection neurons to the contralateral caudal medulla. Various classes of tectal neurons as well as retinal ganglion neurons were identified from the characteristics of the response properties to moving visual stimuli and the properties of the receptive fields. Of these, the Class T1, T2, T3, T4, T5(1), T5(2), T5(3), and T5(4) tectal neurons were activated antidromically by stimuli applied to the contralateral caudal medulla. Only a limited proportion of the Class T5(1) neurons was activated antidromically by stimuli applied to the ipsilateral caudal medulla. On the other hand, the Class T7 and T8 neurons, as well as the Class R2, R3, and R4 retinal neurons, were not activated antidromically by stimuli applied to the caudal medulla of either side. These results suggest a possibility that these tectal neurons which project to the medullary regions form the substrate of the sensorimotor interfacing and contribute to the initiation or coordination of the visually guided behavior, such as prey-catching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3939244     DOI: 10.1007/bf01350071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  13 in total

1.  Functional organization of vestibular and visual inputs to neck and forelimb motoneurons in the frog.

Authors:  M Maeda; P C Magherini; W Precht
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spinal branching of corticospinal axons in the cat.

Authors:  Y Shinoda; A P Arnold; H Asanuma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-10-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Afferents to the optic tectum of the leopard frog: an HRP study.

Authors:  W Wilczyniski; R G Northcutt
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1977-05-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Efferent pathways of the optic tectum in the frog.

Authors:  G Lázár
Journal:  Acta Biol Acad Sci Hung       Date:  1969

5.  Morphology and location of tectal projection neurons in frogs: a study with HRP and cobalt-filling.

Authors:  G Lázár; P Tóth; G Csank; E Kicliter
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1983-03-20       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Excitatory synaptic potentials and morphological classification of tectal neurons of the frog.

Authors:  N Matsumoto; T Bando
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-06-16       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Response characteristics and stratification of tectal neurons in the toad Bufo bufo (L.).

Authors:  G Roth; M Jordan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Specification of tecto-motor outflow in toads by antidromic stimulation of tecto-bulbar/spinal pathways.

Authors:  M Satou; J P Ewert
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1984-01

9.  Topographical relation between olfactory bulb and olfactory tracts in the carp.

Authors:  M Satou; M Ichikawa; K Ueda; S F Takagi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-09-07       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Tongue-muscle-controlling motoneurons in the Japanese toad: topography, morphology and neuronal pathways from the 'snapping-evoking area' in the optic tectum.

Authors:  M Satou; T Matsushima; H Takeuchi; K Ueda
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  7 in total

1.  Responses of medullary neurons to moving visual stimuli in the common toad. I. Characterization of medial reticular neurons by extracellular recording.

Authors:  J P Ewert; E M Framing; E Schürg-Pfeiffer; A Weerasuriya
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  An intracellular study of pretectal influence on the optic tectum of the frog, Rana catesbeiana.

Authors:  Hong-Jian Kang; Xiao-Hong Li
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Edge preference of retinal and tectal neurons in common toads (Bufo bufo) in response to worm-like moving stripes: the question of behaviorally relevant 'position indicators'.

Authors:  H J Tsai; J P Ewert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Stimulus-specific long-term habituation of visually guided orienting behavior toward prey in toads: a 14C-2DG study.

Authors:  T Finkenstädt; J P Ewert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Species-universal stimulus responses, modified through conditioning, reappear after telencephalic lesions in toads.

Authors:  J P Ewert; A W Dinges; T Finkenstädt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1994-07

6.  Local motion processing in the optic tectum of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus.

Authors:  M Satou; A Shiraishi
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Tongue-muscle-controlling motoneurons in the Japanese toad: topography, morphology and neuronal pathways from the 'snapping-evoking area' in the optic tectum.

Authors:  M Satou; T Matsushima; H Takeuchi; K Ueda
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.836

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.