Literature DB >> 3114477

Edge preference of retinal and tectal neurons in common toads (Bufo bufo) in response to worm-like moving stripes: the question of behaviorally relevant 'position indicators'.

H J Tsai, J P Ewert.   

Abstract

Previous experiments have shown that during prey-catching behavior (orienting, snapping) in response to a worm-like moving stripe common toads, Bufo bufo (L.) exhibit a contrast- and direction-dependent edge preference. To a black (b) stripe moving against a white (w) background (b/w), they respond (R*) preferably toward the leading (l) rather the trailing (t) edge (Rl* greater than Rt*), thus displaying 'head preference'. If the contrast-direction is reversed (w/b), the stripe's trailing edge is preferred (Rl* less than Rt*), hence showing 'tail preference'. In the present study, neuronal activities of retinal classes R2 and R3 and tectal classes T5(2) and T7 have been extracellularly recorded in response to leading and trailing edges of a 3 degrees X 30 degrees stripe simulating a worm and traversing the centers of their excitatory receptive fields (ERF) horizontally at a constant angular velocity in variable movement direction (temporo-nasal or naso-temporal). The behavioral contrast-direction dependent edge preferences are best resembled by the responses (R) of prey-selective class T5(2) neurons (Rl:Rt = 10:1 for b/w, 0.3:1 for w/b) and T7 neurons (Rl:Rt = 6:1 for b/w, 0.4:1 for w/b); the T7 responses may be dendritic spikes. This property can be traced back to off-responses dominated retinal class R3 neurons (Rl:Rt = 6:1 for b/w, 0.5:1 for w/b), but not to class R2 (Rl:Rt = 1.2:1 for b/w and 0.9:1 for w/b). The respective edge preference phenomena are independent of the direction of movement. When stimuli were moved against a stationary black-white structured background, the 'head preference' to the black stripe and the 'tail preference' to the white stripe were maintained in class R3, T5(2), and T7 neurons. If the stripe traversed the ERF together with the structured background in the same direction at the same velocity, the responses of tectal class T5(2) and T7 neurons were strongly inhibited, particularly in the former. Responses of retinal R2 neurons in comparable situations could be reduced by about 50%, while class R3 neurons responded to both the stimulus and the moving background structure. The results support the concept that the prey feature analyzing system in toads applies principles of (i) 'parallel' and (ii) 'hierarchial' information processing. These are (i) divergence of retinal R3 neuronal output contributes to stimulus edge positioning and (in combination with R2 output) area evaluation in tectal neurons and to stimulus area evaluation and (in combination with R4 output) sensitivity for moving background structures in pretectal neurons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3114477     DOI: 10.1007/bf00615249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  11 in total

1.  Summation and inhibition in the frog's retina.

Authors:  H B BARLOW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1953-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The twelfth Bartlett memorial lecture: the role of single neurons in the psychology of perception.

Authors:  H B Barlow
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-05

3.  Question of "head preference" in response to worm-like dummies during prey-capture of toads, Bufo bufo.

Authors:  H Burghagen; J P Ewert
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Movement-sensitive neurones in the toad's retina.

Authors:  J P Ewert; F Hock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Neuronal correlates of edge preference in prey-catching behavior of toads Bufo bufo.

Authors:  H Tsai; H Burghagen; E Schürg-Pfeiffer; J P Ewert
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1983-06

6.  The neural basis of visually guided behavior.

Authors:  J P Ewert
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  [On the function of relative hierarchy of moods (shown by the example of the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of predatory behavior in beasts of prey)].

Authors:  P Leyhausen
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1965-06

8.  The quantitative effect of visual and tactile stimuli on the prey-catching behaviour of ferrets (Putorius furo L.).

Authors:  R Apfelbach; U Wester
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  The antidromic activation of tectal neurons by electrical stimuli applied to the caudal medulla oblongata in the toad, Bufo bufo L.

Authors:  M Satou; J P Ewert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Anatomy and physiology of vision in the frog (Rana pipiens).

Authors:  H R MATURANA; J Y LETTVIN; W S MCCULLOCH; W H PITTS
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  3 in total

1.  How does the toad's visual system discriminate different worm-like stimuli?

Authors:  D L Wang; M A Arbib
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  A model of anuran retina relating interneurons to ganglion cell responses.

Authors:  J L Teeters; M A Arbib
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Configurational pattern discrimination responsible for dishabituation in common toads Bufo bufo (L.): behavioral tests of the predictions of a neural model.

Authors:  D Wang; J P Ewert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.836

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.