| Literature DB >> 3937154 |
J C Cantor, D E Morisky, L W Green, D M Levine, D S Salkever.
Abstract
To examine the relative cost-effectiveness of single versus multiple patient education strategies to reduce hypertension, we assigned patients to seven intervention groups and to a usual-care control group using a randomized factorial design. We compared cost-effectiveness measures for single, double, and triple combinations of (a) a clinic exit interview with patients to clarify their medical regimens, (b) an educational meeting with a member of the patient's family to aid in management at home, and (c) a series of small group sessions to help patients overcome personal barriers to management. We observed consistent results for six different effectiveness measures under a variety of decision-making rules. Our results suggest that in the absence of targeting of multiple interventions to systematically selected high-risk patients, multiple intervention combinations are not more cost-effective than single interventions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1985 PMID: 3937154 DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(85)90071-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prev Med ISSN: 0091-7435 Impact factor: 4.018