Literature DB >> 30016520

A conceptual model of social networks and mechanisms of cancer mortality, and potential strategies to improve survival.

Candyce H Kroenke1.   

Abstract

Women with larger personal social networks have better breast cancer survival and a lower risk of mortality. However, little work has examined the mechanisms through which social networks influence breast cancer outcomes and cancer outcomes more generally, potentially limiting the development of feasible, clinically effective interventions. In fact, much of the emphasis in cancer research regarding the influence of social relationships on cancer outcomes has focused on the benefits of the provision of social support to patients, especially through peer support groups, and only more recently through patient navigation. Though critically important, there are other ways through which social relationships might influence outcomes, around which interventions might be developed. In addition to social support, these include social resources, social norms, social contagion, social roles, and social burdens and obligations. This narrative review addresses how social networks may influence cancer outcomes and discusses potential strategies for improving outcomes given these relationships. The paper (a) describes background and limitations of previous research, (b) outlines terms and provides a conceptual model that describes interrelationships between social networks and relevant variables and their hypothesized influence on cancer outcomes, (c) clarifies social and psychosocial mechanisms through which social networks affect downstream factors, (d) describes downstream behavioral, treatment, and physiological factors through which these subsequently influence recurrence and mortality, and (e) describes needed research and potential opportunities to enhance translation. Though most literature in this area pertains to breast cancer, this review has substantial relevance for cancer outcomes generally. Further clarification and research regarding potential mechanisms are needed to translate epidemiological findings on social networks into clinical and community strategies to improve cancer outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30016520      PMCID: PMC6065533          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibx061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  141 in total

1.  Personality and breast cancer risk and survival: the Miyagi cohort study.

Authors:  Yuko Minami; Toru Hosokawa; Naoki Nakaya; Yumi Sugawara; Yoshikazu Nishino; Yoichiro Kakugawa; Akira Fukao; Ichiro Tsuji
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Optimizing eHealth breast cancer interventions: which types of eHealth services are effective?

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Robert Hawkins; Suzanne Pingree; Linda J Roberts; Helene E McDowell; Bret R Shaw; Ron Serlin; Lisa Dillenburg; Christopher M Swoboda; Jeong-Yeob Han; James A Stewart; Cindy L Carmack-Taylor; Andrew Salner; Tanya R Schlam; Fiona McTavish; David H Gustafson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Robinson-White; Brenna Conroy; Kathleen H Slavish; Margaret Rosenzweig
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 5.  Family support in advanced cancer.

Authors:  B A Given; C W Given; S Kozachik
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 6.  Inflammatory cytokines in cancer: tumour necrosis factor and interleukin 6 take the stage.

Authors:  Sergei I Grivennikov; Michael Karin
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Cancer and patient-physician communication.

Authors:  Michael Diefenbach; Gina Turner; Kristen M Carpenter; Lisa Kennedy Sheldon; Karen M Mustian; Mary A Gerend; Christine Rini; Christian von Wagner; Ellen R Gritz; Amy McQueen; Heather M Prayor-Patterson; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009

8.  Effects of social relationships on survival for women with breast cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  N Waxler-Morrison; T G Hislop; B Mears; L Kan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Meta-analysis of the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival time in cancer patients.

Authors:  Geir Smedslund; Gerd Inger Ringdal
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Effect of spouse support and health beliefs on medication adherence.

Authors:  W J Doherty; H G Schrott; L Metcalf; L Iasiello-Vailas
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  8 in total

1.  Social Relationships and Functional Impairment in Aging Cancer Survivors: A Longitudinal Social Network Study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Guida; Cheryl L Holt; Cher M Dallal; Xin He; Robert Gold; Hongjie Liu
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-05-15

2.  Cancer-Related Debt and Mental-Health-Related Quality of Life among Rural Cancer Survivors: Do Family/Friend Informal Caregiver Networks Moderate the Relationship?

Authors:  Emily Hallgren; Theresa A Hastert; Leslie R Carnahan; Jan M Eberth; Scherezade K Mama; Karriem S Watson; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  2020-02-01

3.  Social Integration, Marital Status, and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A 20-Year Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald; Elizabeth M Poole; Anil K Sood; Olivia I Okereke; Ichiro Kawachi; Laura D Kubzansky; Shelley S Tworoger
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 4.312

4.  Social support and outcomes in older adults with lung cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Chambers; Emily Damone; Yi Tang Chen; Kirsten Nyrop; Allison Deal; Hyman Muss; Marjory Charlot
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  The Prospective Association of Social Integration With Life Span and Exceptional Longevity in Women.

Authors:  Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald; Emily S Zevon; Ichiro Kawachi; Reginald D Tucker-Seeley; Francine Grodstein; Laura D Kubzansky
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Prediagnosis social support, social integration, living status, and colorectal cancer mortality in postmenopausal women from the women's health initiative.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Electra D Paskett; Crystal W Cené; Bette J Caan; Juhua Luo; Aladdin H Shadyab; Jamaica R M Robinson; Rami Nassir; Dorothy S Lane; Garnet L Anderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers.

Authors:  Tess Thompson; Dana Ketcher; Tamryn F Gray; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Occupational disparities in survival in Korean women with cancer: a nationwide registry linkage study.

Authors:  Hye-Eun Lee; Eun-A Kim; Masayoshi Zaitsu; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.