Literature DB >> 3933654

What happens to defaulters from a diabetic clinic?

M S Hammersley, M R Holland, S Walford, P A Thorn.   

Abstract

The annual rate at which patients defaulted from follow up at the Wolverhampton diabetic clinic between 1971 and 1981 was 4.1% overall and 3.5% in white patients. In 1982 a study was started to discover what happened to white patients, born after 1919, who defaulted from the hospital clinic. There were 162 defaulters, of whom 19 had died. Of the remaining 143 patients, 19 were attending another hospital diabetic clinic, 22 had moved out of the area, and 28 refused to participate in the study. Seventy four agreed to participate: 39 were treated with diet, 15 with oral hypoglycaemic agents, and 20 with insulin. They were matched for sex, age, treatment, and duration of diabetes with patients attending the clinic. Non-insulin dependent defaulters were significantly more overweight at diagnosis (40% v 25%; p less than 0.05) and remained more obese. They developed significantly higher diastolic blood pressure (94 v 86 mm Hg; p less than 0.02) and higher haemoglobin A1 (HbA1) concentrations (11.7% v 8.4%; p less than 0.01). They had significantly more neuropathy at reassessment (15 v 6 out of 54; p less than 0.05) and a greater incidence of new retinopathy (p less than 0.02), which correlated with their higher diastolic blood pressures (p less than 0.01) and HbA1 concentration (p less than 0.02). In defaulters who were treated with insulin only the prevalence of neuropathy was significantly different from that in controls (p less than 0.05). Defaulters received minimal medical supervision and suffered greater morbidity than regular attenders at the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3933654      PMCID: PMC1417410          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6505.1330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  8 in total

1.  Body weight at different ages and heights.

Authors:  W F F KEMSLEY
Journal:  Ann Eugen       Date:  1952-05

2.  Why patients were lost from follow-up at an urban diabetic clinic.

Authors:  I N Scobie; A B Rafferty; P C Franks; P H Sönksen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-01-15

3.  Community care service for diabetics in the Poole area.

Authors:  R D Hill
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-05-08

4.  Metabolic control of diabetes in general practice clinics: comparison with a hospital clinic.

Authors:  B M Singh; M R Holland; P A Thorn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

5.  Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics.

Authors:  T M Hayes; J Harries
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

6.  Diabetic clinics today and tomorrow: mini-clinics in general practice.

Authors:  P A Thorn; R G Russell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-06-02

7.  Prevalence of retinopathy in a diabetic clinic.

Authors:  R J Donovan
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-06-03

8.  Prognosis of diabetics with diabetes onset before the age of thirty-one. II. Factors influencing the prognosis.

Authors:  T Deckert; J E Poulsen; M Larsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 10.122

  8 in total
  26 in total

1.  Diabetes and its care--what do patients expect?

Authors:  A L Kinmonth; E Murphy; T Marteau
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-08

2.  Defaulters in general practice: reasons for default and patterns of attendance.

Authors:  M P Cosgrove
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Diabetes in tropical Africa: a prospective study, 1981-7. II. Course and prognosis.

Authors:  D G McLarty; L Kinabo; A B Swai
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-28

4.  Factors affecting follow-up non-attendance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rayson Rui Sheng Lee; Mas'uud Ibnu Samsudin; Thiru Thirumoorthy; Lian Leng Low; Yu Heng Kwan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  Diabetic non-attenders.

Authors:  K Shotliff
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation. Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-07

7.  Microvascular and acute complications in IDDM patients: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  A follow-up study of the occurrence and consequences of HbA1c measurements in an unselected cohort of non-pharmacologically treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Jette Kolding Kristensen; Henrik Stoevring
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.581

9.  Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care.

Authors:  B Hurwitz; C Goodman; J Yudkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-06

10.  Patients' Evaluation of the Quality of Diabetes Care (PEQD): development and validation of a new instrument.

Authors:  F Pouwer; F J Snoek
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.