Literature DB >> 18297565

A follow-up study of the occurrence and consequences of HbA1c measurements in an unselected cohort of non-pharmacologically treated patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Jette Kolding Kristensen1, Henrik Stoevring.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the occurrence of HbA1c measurements among non-pharmacologically treated diabetes patients, and to evaluate whether poor blood glucose regulation (HbA1c >8%) prompted intensification of treatment.
METHOD: Data from the National Health Service Registry, the Regional Laboratory Database and the Danish National Hospital Registry were collected from 2002 to 2004 to identify and describe all Type 2 diabetic patients above 40 years of age in a background population of nearly 660,000 citizens in Aarhus County, corresponding to 12% of the total Danish population.
RESULTS: A total of 1989 had at least one HbA1c measurement, whereas 484 (20%) had no HbA1c measurement at all in 2003. Most patients had an HbA1c of less than 8%, and for 820 (41%) HbA1c was less than 6.5%, but for 316 (16%) patients, the first HbA1c measurement in 2003 was above 8%. After 6 months, patients with HbA1c above 8% had a higher probability of initiating pharmacological treatment (M; 0.64; 95% CI 0.58-0.70) (F; 0.68; 95% CI 0.58-0.77) than patients with HbA1c below 8% (M; 0.12; 95% CI 0.10-0.14) (F; 0.11; 95% CI 0.09-0.14).
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that poor blood glucose regulation (HbA1c >8%) prompted a shift from non-pharmacological treatment to pharmacological treatment for most patients. However, a substantial group of patients are either not monitored on a regular basis or, if monitored, their elevated measurements of HbA1c do not prompt initiation of pharmacological treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18297565      PMCID: PMC3406631          DOI: 10.1080/02813430801892532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  11 in total

1.  Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised study.

Authors:  P Gaede; P Vedel; H H Parving; O Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Dietary and physical activity counselling on type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance by physicians and nurses in primary healthcare in Finland.

Authors:  Marita Poskiparta; Kirsti Kasila; Päivi Kiuru
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 3.  Earlier intervention in type 2 diabetes: the case for achieving early and sustained glycaemic control.

Authors:  C J Bailey; S Del Prato; D Eddy; B Zinman
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  HbAlc in an unselected population of 4438 people with type 2 diabetes in a Danish county.

Authors:  J K Kristensen; F Bro; A Sandbaek; K Dahler-Eriksen; J F Lassen; T Lauritzen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  The gap between guidelines and reality: Type 2 diabetes in a National Diabetes Register 1996-2003.

Authors:  B Eliasson; J Cederholm; P Nilsson; S Gudbjörnsdóttir
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.359

6.  Outcomes of diabetes care: a population-based study.

Authors:  Lisbeth M Färnkvist; Berit M Lundman
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.038

7.  Prevalence, care, and outcomes for patients with diet-controlled diabetes in general practice: cross sectional survey.

Authors:  J Hippisley-Cox; M Pringle
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Jul 31-Aug 6       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Intensive insulin therapy prevents the progression of diabetic microvascular complications in Japanese patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a randomized prospective 6-year study.

Authors:  Y Ohkubo; H Kishikawa; E Araki; T Miyata; S Isami; S Motoyoshi; Y Kojima; N Furuyoshi; M Shichiri
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  What happens to defaulters from a diabetic clinic?

Authors:  M S Hammersley; M R Holland; S Walford; P A Thorn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-11-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  The effect of screening on the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes in primary care.

Authors:  Mark Spigt; Annelies Rikkers; Mirte Doornbos; Evelyn Wouters; Isi Spitz; Ludovic Van Amelsvoort; Paul Zwietering
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.581

Review 2.  Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kamlesh Khunti; Marilia B Gomes; Stuart Pocock; Marina V Shestakova; Stéphane Pintat; Peter Fenici; Niklas Hammar; Jesús Medina
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.577

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.