Literature DB >> 3933411

Quality of life index: development and psychometric properties.

C E Ferrans, M J Powers.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study on which this article is based was to assess the validity and reliability of an instrument designed to measure quality of life. Sixty-four items applicable to both healthy subjects and dialysis patients were tested with graduate students (n = 88); six items relative to dialysis were added, and the instrument was administered to dialysis patients (n = 37). Items were based on literature review, which supported content validity. Correlations between the instrument and an overall satisfaction with life question of 0.75 (graduate students) and 0.65 (dialysis patients) supported criterion-related validity. Support for reliability was provided by test-retest correlations of 0.87 (graduate students) and 0.81 (dialysis patients) and Cronbach's alphas of 0.93 (graduate students) and 0.90 (dialysis patients).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3933411     DOI: 10.1097/00012272-198510000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  153 in total

Review 1.  A review of health-related quality-of-life measures in stroke.

Authors:  B A Golomb; B G Vickrey; R D Hays
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement.

Authors:  T Trauer; A Mackinnon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  A comparison of four quality of life instruments in cardiac patients: SF-36, QLI, QLMI, and SEIQoL.

Authors:  H J Smith; R Taylor; A Mitchell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Health related quality of life: a changing construct?

Authors:  Jürg Bernhard; Adam Lowy; Natascha Mathys; Richard Herrmann; Christoph Hürny
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Exploratory study of perceived quality of life with implanted standing neuroprostheses.

Authors:  Loretta M Rohde; Bette R Bonder; Ronald J Triolo
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments.

Authors:  K L Haywood; A M Garratt; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Psychometric evaluation of the Brief Cancer Impact Assessment among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Catherine M Alfano; Bonnie A McGregor; Alan Kuniyuki; Bryce B Reeve; Deborah J Bowen; Ashley Wilder Smith; Kathy B Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Kathleen E Malone; Patricia A Ganz; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 2.935

9.  Quality of life assessment in cardiac populations.

Authors:  Hannah McGee
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Parents' perceptions of functioning in families having a child with a genetic condition.

Authors:  Kathleen A Knafl; George J Knafl; Agatha M Gallo; Denise Angst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.