Literature DB >> 3930429

Selection for life span in Drosophila melanogaster.

L S Luckinbill, M J Clare.   

Abstract

Selection for reproduction at an early or a late age in life was applied to populations of D. melanogaster for 21 to 29 generations, with two experimental treatments of larval density. Populations with high and uncontrolled numbers of competing larvae responded strongly to selection for late-reproduction with the length of adult life increasing by as much as 50 per cent. In this treatment, selection produced true breeding long- and short-lived lines. When populations of developing larvae were held low, however, longevity fluctuated wildly during selection, showing little overall response, as several previous tests of senescence theory have also found. These experiments suggest that life span is either physiologically limited in that environment, or populations are unable to respond because either phenotype/genotype correlations are reversed, or genetic variation is suppressed. The inability of former studies to obtain a response to selection appears to have resulted from the artifactual introduction of strong gene-environment interactions through the use of a competition-free environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3930429     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1985.66

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  35 in total

Review 1.  Hutchinson-Guilford progeria syndrome.

Authors:  P K Sarkar; R A Shinton
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Partridge; N Prowse; P Pignatelli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Longevity and metabolism in Drosophila melanogaster: genetic correlations between life span and age-specific metabolic rate in populations artificially selected for long life.

Authors:  Aziz A Khazaeli; Wayne Van Voorhies; James W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Survival analysis of life span quantitative trait loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sergey V Nuzhdin; Aziz A Khazaeli; James W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-04-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Quantitative genetics of postponed aging in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Analysis of outbred populations.

Authors:  E W Hutchinson; M R Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Quantitative genetics of postponed aging in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Analysis of selected lines.

Authors:  E W Hutchinson; A J Shaw; M R Rose
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Expression of genetic and environmental variation during ageing : 2. Selection for increased lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  G Engström; L E Liljedahl; T Björklund
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Pleiotropy and life history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: uncoupling life span and early fecundity.

Authors:  Aziz A Khazaeli; James W Curtsinger
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 9.  Comparative genetics of longevity and cancer: insights from long-lived rodents.

Authors:  Vera Gorbunova; Andrei Seluanov; Zhengdong Zhang; Vadim N Gladyshev; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 10.  Integrating evolutionary and molecular genetics of aging.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt; Paul S Schmidt
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.