Literature DB >> 3929934

Small bowel biopsy for malabsorption: comparison of the diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic forceps and capsule biopsy specimens.

A S Mee, M Burke, A G Vallon, J Newman, P B Cotton.   

Abstract

Biopsy specimens of the small bowel were obtained from 40 patients suspected of having malabsorption. Four different techniques were used at a single session--namely, endoscopic biopsy of the descending duodenum using paediatric and standard size forceps and suction capsule biopsy of the descending duodenum and the proximal jejunum. Specimens were compared for size, adequacy, and ability to confirm or exclude mucosal abnormality. Fourteen patients had villous atrophy. In all patients four biopsy specimens were obtained with paediatric endoscopic forceps and four with standard endoscopic forceps. No capsule biopsy specimen was retrieved from the duodenum in three patients and from the jejunum in five patients. Specimens were considered to be adequate in 36 patients when paediatric forceps were used, in 39 when standard forceps were used, in 28 on duodenal capsule biopsy, and in 32 on jejunal capsule biopsy. This study indicates that the most reliable method for diagnosing or excluding villous atrophy is endoscopic forceps biopsy of the descending duodenum, provided that at least four specimens are obtained with standard size forceps.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3929934      PMCID: PMC1417146          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6498.769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  15 in total

1.  The endoscopic demonstration of coeliac disease.

Authors:  F M Stevens; C F McCarthy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  The histological classification of duodenitis in fibreoptic biopsy specimens.

Authors:  R Whitehead; M Roca; D D Meikle; J Skinner; S C Truelove
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Endoscopic biopsies of normal duodenal mucosa.

Authors:  E R Korn; P Foroozan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  A rapid method of obtaining a jejunal biopsy using a Crosby capsule and a gastrointestinal fiberscope.

Authors:  B J Prout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Peroral biopsy of the small intestine. A review of its diagnostic usefulness.

Authors:  C E Rubin; W O Dobbins
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Jejunal biopsy without the need for screening.

Authors:  G Holdstock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-06-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Endoscopic small intestinal biopsy.

Authors:  B B Scott; D Jenkins
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Coeliac disease diagnosed by means of duodenoscopy and endoscopic duodenal biopsy.

Authors:  R Gillberg; C Ahrén
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Adequacy of endoscopic biopsy specimens for disaccharidase assays.

Authors:  J H Lee; W J Griffiths; I Zantout; J D Welsh
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1978-12

10.  Endoscopic duodenal biopsies in coeliac disease and duodenitis.

Authors:  G Holdstock; O E Eade; P Isaacson; C L Smith
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  13 in total

1.  A prospective study of the prevalence of undiagnosed coeliac disease in laboratory defined iron and folate deficiency.

Authors:  M R Howard; A J Turnbull; P Morley; P Hollier; R Webb; A Clarke
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Role of video endoscopy in managing small bowel disease.

Authors:  P Swain; A Fritscher-Ravens
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Management of coeliac disease: a changing diagnostic approach but what value in follow up?

Authors:  M Acalovschi; V Jayanthi; C S Probert; J F Mayberry
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-03

4.  Estimating the incidence of coeliac disease with capture-recapture methods within four geographic areas in Italy.

Authors:  G Corrao; P Usai; G Galatola; N Ansaldi; A Meini; M A Pelli; G Castellucci; G R Corazza
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Coeliac disease.

Authors:  G R Corazza; V Villanacci
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Pearls and pitfalls in the diagnosis of adult celiac disease.

Authors:  H J Freeman
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Diagnosis and treatment of coeliac disease.

Authors:  Karel Geboes; Karen P Geboes
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2009-04-29

8.  Diagnosis of celiac disease in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Joseph A Murray; Shadi Rashtak; Alberto Rubio-Tapia
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 46.802

9.  Small bowel biopsy by remote control: experimental study on dogs.

Authors:  F Vaxman; A Lambert; J F Grenier
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Coeliac disease and malignancy of the duodenum: diagnosis by endoscopy, successful treatment of the malignancy, and response to a gluten free diet.

Authors:  M J Hall; B T Cooper; N Rooney; H Thompson; A E Read
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.