Literature DB >> 3928831

Cerebellar nuclear cell activity during antagonist cocontraction and reciprocal inhibition of forearm muscles.

R Wetts, J F Kalaska, A M Smith.   

Abstract

Monkeys were trained to exert a maintained isometric pinch with the thumb and forefinger. This task reliably elicited a simultaneous cocontraction of the forearm muscles. The same monkeys were also taught to insert the open hand into a manipulandum, flex and extend the wrist 35 and 15 degrees, respectively, and maintain an isometric wrist position against a mechanical stop for 1 s. This second task comprised two conditions: a dynamic or movement phase and a static or isometric phase. Movement always involved a wrist displacement of 50 degrees. Although some forearm muscles demonstrated bidirectional activity during the wrist displacement phase, all the wrist and finger muscles were alternatively active in isometric flexion or extension. Of the neurons in the dentate and interposed nuclei that consistently changed discharge during repeated isometric prehension, over 90% (61/67) of the neurons increased activity during this cocontraction of forearm muscles. About 70% (47/67) of these same nuclear cells discharged with a reciprocal pattern of firing during alternating wrist flexion-extension movements. Forty-six neurons had sustained and reciprocal discharge during the maintained isometric wrist postures. No differences were seen between the activity patterns of dentate and interposed cells with respect to either the prehension task or the reciprocal wrist-movement task. The discharge frequency of some dentate and interpositus neurons could be correlated with prehensile force as well as velocity of wrist movement and torque developed by wrist muscles. Correlation coefficients were calculated between nuclear cell discharge and the amplitude of the surface EMGs of the flexors and extensors of the wrist and fingers during the wrist-movement task. Sixteen nuclear cells showed low-order, but reliably positive, correlations with one of the two forearm muscle groups (mean r = 0.33). In contrast, a sample of seven Purkinje cells recorded during the same task demonstrated low-order correlations that were negative in sign (mean r = -0.30) between discharge frequency and one of the two forearm EMGs.

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3928831     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.2.231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  17 in total

1.  The activity of monkey thalamic and motor cortical neurones in a skilled, ballistic movement.

Authors:  E G Butler; M K Horne; N J Hawkins
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Lobular patterns of cerebellar activation in verbal working-memory and finger-tapping tasks as revealed by functional MRI.

Authors:  J E Desmond; J D Gabrieli; A D Wagner; B L Ginier; G H Glover
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  What features of limb movements are encoded in the discharge of cerebellar neurons?

Authors:  Timothy J Ebner; Angela L Hewitt; Laurentiu S Popa
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Responses of interposed and dentate neurons to perturbations of the locomotor cycle.

Authors:  A B Schwartz; T J Ebner; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Muscle coactivation: definitions, mechanisms, and functions.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Specific cerebellar regions are related to force amplitude and rate of force development.

Authors:  M B Spraker; D M Corcos; A S Kurani; J Prodoehl; S P Swinnen; D E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Excitatory inputs to cerebellar dentate nucleus neurons from the cerebral cortex in the cat.

Authors:  Y Shinoda; Y Sugiuchi; T Futami
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Locomotor deficits in the mutant mouse, Lurcher.

Authors:  P A Fortier; A M Smith; S Rossignol
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Dynamic correspondence between Purkinje cell discharge and forelimb muscle activity during reaching.

Authors:  Robert N Holdefer; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 10.  Physiologic changes associated with cerebellar dystonia.

Authors:  Vikram G Shakkottai
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.