Literature DB >> 3920876

Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: results in 32 cases.

J A Jackson, D R Leake, N J Schneiders, L A Rolak, G R Kelley, J J Ford, S H Appel, R N Bryan.   

Abstract

A prospective clinical study was performed in 32 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) to evaluate the sensitivity of lesion detection and accuracy of lesion localization by neurologic examination, delayed enhanced computed tomography (CT) with a double dose of contrast material, and proton magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. After neurologic examination patients were classified by probability of MS (possible, four patients; probable, three patients; and definite, 25 patients) and by disease activity (acute, chronic with acute exacerbation, or chronic progressive). Subsequently they underwent delayed enhanced CT scanning and MR imaging with more than one spin-echo technique. In five of seven patients with possible or probable MS, both MR imaging and delayed enhanced CT were negative. In 25 cases of definite MS, MR imaging detected pathology in 19 (76%) cases, while CT detected lesions in 15 (60%) of 25 cases. In acute lesions (acute or chronic with acute exacerbation), the two techniques were of similar sensitivity (delayed CT was positive in 65% and MR imaging in 60%), while in chronic progressive MS, MR imaging was superior in lesion detection (MR imaging positive in 75%; delayed CT in 25%). While most lesions (55%) were seen in corresponding locations in both studies, neither MR nor delayed CT correlated well with lesion localization by neurologic examination because a large number of asymptomatic lesions were imaged and many symptomatic lesions were undetected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3920876      PMCID: PMC8332872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Multiple sclerosis].

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; A L Kühn; M Backens; K Shariat; P Kostopoulos; P Papanagiotou
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  One-year MR imaging follow-up of patients with multiple sclerosis under cortisone therapy.

Authors:  D Uhlenbrock; E Herbe; D Seidel; W Gehlen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Evaluation by MRI of paraparesis and tetraparesis of undiagnosed aetiology.

Authors:  E B Ringelstein; D Krieger; B Hünermann
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  MRI parameters in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  I Reider-Groswasser; E Kott; J Benmair; M Huberman; Y Machtey; I Gelernter
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Multiple sclerosis: diagnostic value of computerized tomography with delayed scanning after a double-dose of contrast medium in comparison with other diagnostic tests.

Authors:  C Weitze; G Hertel; W Brittner
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Correlation between multimodal evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Comi; V Martinelli; S Medaglini; T Locatelli; M Filippi; N Canal; F Triulzi; A Del Maschio
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Clinical applications of magnetic resonance imaging--current status.

Authors:  D Cammoun; W R Hendee; K A Davis
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-12

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L S Honig; W A Sheremata
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Magnetic resonance in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G Scotti; G Scialfa; A Biondi; L Landoni; D Caputo; C L Cazzullo
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine.

Authors:  D M Hadley; G M Teasdale
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.