Literature DB >> 3919869

Invasive cervical cancer and combined oral contraceptives. WHO collaborative study of neoplasia and steroid contraceptives.

.   

Abstract

A multicentre, hospital based case-control study is being conducted under the auspices of the World Health Organisation to determine whether steroid contraceptives alter the risk of gynaecological, breast, and hepatic neoplasms. Preliminary results, largely from developing countries, on the relation between combined oral contraceptives and invasive cervical carcinoma showed a relative risk of 1.19 (95% confidence interval 0.99-1.44) in women who had ever used oral contraceptives. The risk increased with duration of use, giving a relative risk of 1.53 after five years. This finding supports a causal interpretation, but it could also be due to incomplete control for confounding sexual variables and other sources of bias.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3919869      PMCID: PMC1418262          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.290.6473.961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  18 in total

1.  A case control study into the possible effects of birth control pills on pre-clinical carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  A J Worth; D A Boyes
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1972-08

2.  Relationship of oral contraceptives to cervical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  D B Thomas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Oral contraceptives and cervical cancer.

Authors:  L Andolsek; J Kovacic; M Kozuh; B Litt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Oral contraceptives and cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-10-29       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Smoking and carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  J L Lyon; J W Gardner; D W West; W M Stanish; R M Hebertson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Cigarette smoking and dysplasia and carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  E Trevathan; P Layde; L A Webster; J B Adams; B B Benigno; H Ory
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983 Jul 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Contraceptive choice and prevalence of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  H Ory; Z Naib; S B Conger; R A Hatcher; C W Tyler
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Neoplasia of the cervix uteri and contraception: a possible adverse effect of the pill.

Authors:  M P Vessey; M Lawless; K McPherson; D Yeates
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-10-22       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Viruses and gynecologic cancers: herpesvirus protein (ICP 10/AG-4), a cervical tumor antigen that fulfills the criteria for a marker of carcinogenicity.

Authors:  L Aurelian; I I Kessler; N B Rosenshein; G Barbour
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Characteristics of women with dysplasia or carcinoma in situ of the cervix uteri.

Authors:  R W Harris; L A Brinton; R H Cowdell; D C Skegg; P G Smith; M P Vessey; R Doll
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The relationship between oral contraceptive use, cancer and vascular disease.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; S Franceschi; P Bruzzi; F Parazzini; P Boyle
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Oral contraceptives and human papillomavirus infection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  G Gitsch; C Kainz; M Studnicka; A Reinthaller; G Tatra; G Breitenecker
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Oral contraceptive use and the prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  I Schönborn; P Nischan; K Ebeling
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Reproductive factors in the etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.

Authors:  J L Stanford; D B Thomas
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and c-erbB-2 compared with conventional histopathological factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  I Schönborn; W Zschiesche; C Minguillon; E Spitzer; M Möhner; K Ebeling; R Grosse
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Comparison of risk factors for squamous cell and adenocarcinomas of the cervix: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Berrington de González; S Sweetland; J Green
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.