Literature DB >> 7883773

Prognostic value of proliferating cell nuclear antigen and c-erbB-2 compared with conventional histopathological factors in breast cancer.

I Schönborn1, W Zschiesche, C Minguillon, E Spitzer, M Möhner, K Ebeling, R Grosse.   

Abstract

Expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein has been assessed in 471 women with breast cancer to evaluate their prognostic value as compared to conventional histopathological factors. In univariate analysis, high PCNA expression (> or = 20%) predicted a significantly worse survival in lymph-node-negative tumors (univariate P = 0.031). However, the effect disappeared in multivariate analysis and the histological grade remained the only independent factor for this group. Despite its close correlation to histological grade (P < 0.001), PCNA expression discriminated subsets with different survival within the heterogeneous group of moderately differentiated tumors (univariate P = 0.073, multivariate P = 0.075). PCNA expression was not found to be a significant prognostic factor in lymph-node-positive tumors, thus it was of limited value for breast cancer patients as a whole. c-erbB-2 protein overexpression was associated with a worse survival (univariate P = 0.019, multivariate P = 0.057) for the entire group of patients. The effect was mainly attributed to the significance of c-erbB-2 as an independent factor in lymph-node-positive (up to three nodes, multivariate P = 0.04; four or more nodes: multivariate P = 0.017) and large tumors (> 2 cm: multivariate P = 0.002). c-erbB-2 was without significance in lymph-node-negative patients. Though both factors might amplify the prognostic information for distinct patient subsets they do not achieve the strong prognostic value of conventional histopathological features in breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7883773     DOI: 10.1007/bf01202223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  42 in total

1.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Galea; R W Blamey; C E Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Comparison of recalled and validated oral contraceptive histories.

Authors:  P Nischan; K Ebeling; D B Thomas; U Hirsch
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer. An ECOG study.

Authors:  K W Gilchrist; L Kalish; V E Gould; S Hirschl; J E Imbriglia; W M Levy; A S Patchefsky; D W Penner; J Pickren; J A Roth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  PCNA and Ki67 expression in breast carcinoma: correlations with clinical and biological variables.

Authors:  E Leonardi; S Girlando; G Serio; F A Mauri; G Perrone; S Scampini; P Dalla Palma; M Barbareschi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Proliferating-cell nuclear antigen (PC10) immunolabelling and other proliferation indices as prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Aaltomaa; P Lipponen; S Papinaho; K Syrjänen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Analysis of reproducibility of subjective grading systems for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  B Stenkvist; S Westman-Naeser; J Vegelius; J Holmquist; B Nordin; E Bengtsson; O Eriksson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Cell proliferation in breast carcinoma assessed by a PCNA grading system and its relation to other prognostic variables.

Authors:  P G Betta; G Bottero; M Pavesi; M Pastormerlo; D Bellinger; F Tallarida
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project: prognostic significance of erbB-2 protein overexpression in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S Paik; R Hazan; E R Fisher; R E Sass; B Fisher; C Redmond; J Schlessinger; M E Lippman; C R King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Breast cancer and combined oral contraceptives: results from a multinational study. The WHO Collaborative Study of Neoplasia and Steroid Contraceptives.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prognostic significance of c-erbB-2 expression in node negative breast cancer.

Authors:  S Bianchi; M Paglierani; G Zampi; G Cardona; L Cataliotti; R Bonardi; S Ciatto
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Immunochemical analysis of protein expression in breast epithelial cells transformed by estrogens and high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation.

Authors:  Gloria M Calaf; Debasish Roy; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 4.304

2.  Two estrogen response element sequences near the PCNA gene are not responsible for its estrogen-enhanced expression in MCF7 cells.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Jie Yu; Caleb B Kallen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.