Literature DB >> 3917296

Kidney stone removal: percutaneous versus surgical lithotomy.

G E Brannen, W H Bush, R J Correa, R P Gibbons, J S Elder.   

Abstract

Percutaneous removal of most urinary tract calculi may be performed as a 1-stage effort with techniques and skills developed recently in the specialties of urology and radiology. Ultrasonic fragmentation of most calculi was done to permit their extraction. Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy was performed on 250 consecutive (a single exception) patients bearing stones that required removal. Targeted calculi were removed successfully from 97 per cent of these patients. One patient required surgical lithotomy. The previous 100 patients with stones underwent surgical lithotomy with 96 per cent success. Complications of percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy appeared equitable with those of surgical lithotomy. Of the patients who underwent percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy 6 (6 per cent) required extended hospital days or additional procedures for management of complications. None of these patients required a surgical incision. Anesthesia times were similar for both groups--average 159 plus or minus 4 (standard error) minutes for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy and 193 plus or minus 8 minutes for surgical lithotomy. Hospital recovery days averaged 5.5 plus or minus 0.3 for percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy and 8.4 plus or minus 0.5 for surgical lithotomy (p less than 0.01). Associated costs averaged $7,203 plus or minus 55 for lithotripsy and $8,849 plus or minus 660 for lithotomy (p less than 0.01). The number of narcotic administrations per patient (days 1 to 5 postoperatively) averaged 9.88 plus or minus 0.70 for lithotripsy and 16.82 plus or minus 0.78 for lithotomy (p less than 0.01). The average patient who underwent percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy felt capable of full activity 2.0 plus or minus 0.2 weeks following stone removal, whereas no patient who underwent previous surgical lithotomy recalls a recovery period of less than 3 weeks (p less than 0.01). We believe that most upper urinary tract calculi may be removed cost-effectively with a percutaneous approach. Compared to surgical lithotomy, percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy may result in rapid convalescence with diminished pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3917296     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)48761-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

1.  Large stone burden in a congenital solitary pelvic kidney.

Authors:  Vincent G Bird; John M Shields
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Percutaneous nephrostomy for deflation and stone treatment, I.

Authors:  H J Reuter
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  PCNL MONOTHERAPY FOR RENAL CALCULI - AN INITIAL EXPERIENCE.

Authors:  Deepak Batura
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2017-06-26

4.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of renal pelvis stones with PCK stonelith lithotripter.

Authors:  Abdurrahman Ozgür; N Yalm Iker
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Contemporary practice of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: review of practice in a single region of the UK.

Authors:  Shalom J Srirangam; Richard Darling; Maureen Stopford; Donald Neilson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Middle calyx access is better for single renal pelvic stone in ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Yan Song; Wei Jin; Shengyu Hua; Xiang Fei
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Upper urinary tract stone disease: the changing management in a district general hospital.

Authors:  N M Goble; J C Hammonds; I P Wells
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Middle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Majid Kazemzadeh; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using pneumatic lithotripsy (lithoclast®) alone or in combination with ultrasonic lithotripsy.

Authors:  C One Cho; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Jae Yong Chung; Choong Hee Noh
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

10.  Postpercutaneous nephrolithotomy nephrostogram: is it mandatory? A single center experience.

Authors:  Abdul Rouf Khawaja; Tanveer Iqbal Dar; Ajay Kumar Sharma; Farzana Bashir; Vipin Kumar Tyagi; Mohammad Sajid Bazaz
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2014-02-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.