Literature DB >> 3905369

Reproducibility of microbial mutagenicity assays: II. Testing of carcinogens and noncarcinogens in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli.

V C Dunkel, E Zeiger, D Brusick, E McCoy, D McGregor, K Mortelmans, H S Rosenkranz, V F Simmon.   

Abstract

A total of 63 chemicals were tested for mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, and TA1538, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA in a four-laboratory study. Sixty of the chemicals had been tested for carcinogenicity by the National Cancer Institute or the National Toxicology Program. All chemicals were tested for mutagenicity without metabolic activation and with liver S-9 preparations from uninduced and Aroclor 1254-induced F344 rats, B6C3F1 mice, and Syrian hamsters. The intra- and interlaboratory reproducibility of the Salmonella assay with regard to the overall judgment of mutagenic or nonmutagenic was good. The results in the E coli strain, however, exhibited a high degree of variability between laboratories. With one or two exceptions, the mutagens were detected with S-9 preparations from all three species. The uninduced liver S-9 preparations did not activate any chemicals to mutagens that were not also activated by induced S-9, but some chemicals were detected as mutagens only when induced S-9 was used. A positive mutagenic response in Salmonella was predictive of carcinogenicity 69% of the time; when equivocal carcinogens and borderline mutagens were included, the predictivity increased to 83%. Conversely, 76% of the carcinogens were mutagens. When the equivocal carcinogens were included, the proportion dropped to 75%. Relatively few chemicals (18%) were mutagenic in E coli. Not all the carcinogens induced tumors in both rats and mice, and the species-specific carcinogenicity could not be predicted from the S-9-specific mutagenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3905369     DOI: 10.1002/em.2860070902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 0192-2521


  15 in total

Review 1.  The risks of handling cytotoxic drugs. I. Methods of testing exposure.

Authors:  G P Kaijser; W J Underberg; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1990-12-14

2.  Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive.

Authors:  Maged Younes; Gabriele Aquilina; Laurence Castle; Karl-Heinz Engel; Paul Fowler; Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez; Peter Fürst; Ursula Gundert-Remy; Rainer Gürtler; Trine Husøy; Melania Manco; Wim Mennes; Peter Moldeus; Sabina Passamonti; Romina Shah; Ine Waalkens-Berendsen; Detlef Wölfle; Emanuela Corsini; Francesco Cubadda; Didima De Groot; Rex FitzGerald; Sara Gunnare; Arno Christian Gutleb; Jan Mast; Alicja Mortensen; Agnes Oomen; Aldert Piersma; Veronika Plichta; Beate Ulbrich; Henk Van Loveren; Diane Benford; Margherita Bignami; Claudia Bolognesi; Riccardo Crebelli; Maria Dusinska; Francesca Marcon; Elsa Nielsen; Josef Schlatter; Christiane Vleminckx; Stefania Barmaz; Maria Carfí; Consuelo Civitella; Alessandra Giarola; Ana Maria Rincon; Rositsa Serafimova; Camilla Smeraldi; Jose Tarazona; Alexandra Tard; Matthew Wright
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 3.  Non-clinical studies of progesterone.

Authors:  R Sitruk-Ware
Journal:  Climacteric       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  Photochemical reaction of a dye precursor 4-chloro-1,2-phenylenediamine and its associated mutagenic effects.

Authors:  Shuguang Wang; Charity Mosley; Gernerique Stewart; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol A Chem       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 5.  Critical review of styrene genotoxicity focused on the mutagenicity/clastogenicity literature and using current organization of economic cooperation and development guidance.

Authors:  Martha M Moore; Lynn H Pottenger; Tamara House-Knight
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Comparison of in vitro test systems using bacterial and mammalian cells for genotoxicity assessment within the "health-related indication value (HRIV) concept.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Prantl; Meike Kramer; Carsten K Schmidt; Martina Knauer; Stefan Gartiser; Aliaksandra Shuliakevich; Julia Milas; Hansruedi Glatt; Walter Meinl; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Estimating the extent of the health hazard posed by high-production volume chemicals.

Authors:  A R Cunningham; H S Rosenkranz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Relationship between allergic contact dermatitis and electrophilicity.

Authors:  H S Rosenkranz; G Klopman; Y P Zhang; C Graham; M H Karol
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Genetic toxicology: current status of methods of carcinogen identification.

Authors:  R W Tennant; E Zeiger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.